ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Antigen-specific chemokine profiles as biomarkers for detecting
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Th2 bias and T-cell exhaustion characterize the immunopathology of non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Emerging insights into CC and CXC chemokines and their receptors in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.FEBS open bio · 2026Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of smear microscopy, mycobacterial culture, and GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of subclinical tuberculosis: a retrospective multicenter study.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Latent tuberculosis (TB) infection can progress to active TB, which perpetuates community transmission that undermines global TB control efforts. Clinically, interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) are commonly used for active TB case detection. However, low IGRA sensitivity rates lead to false-negative results for a high proportion of active TB cases, thus highlighting IGRA ineffectiveness in differentiating MTB-infected individuals from healthy individuals. Methods: Participants enrolled at Beijing Chest Hospital from May 2020-April 2022 were assigned to healthy control (HC), LTBI, IGRA-positive TB, and IGRA-negative TB groups. Screening cohort MTB antigen-specific blood plasma chemokine concentrations were measured using Luminex xMAP assays then were verified via testing of validation cohort samples. Results: A total of 302 individuals meeting study inclusion criteria were assigned to screening and validation cohorts. Testing revealed significant differences in blood plasma levels of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL16, CXCL21, CCL1, CCL19, CCL27, TNF-α, and IL-4 between IGRA-negative TB and HC groups. Levels of CXCL9, CXCL10, IL-2, and CCL8 biomarkers were predictive for active TB, as reflected by AUC values of ≥0.9. CXCL9-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay sensitivity and specificity rates were 95.9% (95%CI: 91.7-98.3) and 100.0% (92.7-100.0), respectively. Statistically similar AUC values were obtained for CXCL9 and CXCL9-CXCL10 assays, thus demonstrating that combined analysis of CXCL10 and CXCL9 levels did not improve active TB diagnostic performance. Conclusion: The MTB antigen stimulation-based CXCL9 assay may compensate for low IGRA diagnostic accuracy when used to diagnose IGRA-negative active TB cases and thus is an accurate and sensitive alternative to IGRAs for detecting MTB infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.