ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2023
Team principles for successful interdisciplinary research teams.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of the micro-research model on building research capacity in undergraduate health professions students in HIV-related research: a comprehensive evaluation using the RE-AIM framework.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- State of the AI: Post-Deployment Monitoring of Radiology-Focused Internally Developed AI.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Review
- Interdisciplinary collaborative skill development in a health research training program in Zambia.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- A point-based system to determine authorship eligibility in a large clinical trial: Insights from the ISCHEMIA trial's authorship nomination system.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- The Effect of Situational Leadership on Healthcare Service Quality Through Crisis Management and Resources Availability: The Moderating Role of Leader Experience.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Twelve tips for using educational data mining and machine learning to predict performance in high-stakes health professions education exams.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Review
- Process makes perfect: mapping science team behavior across phases.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Exploring the Multifaceted Role of Scientific Paper and Poster Presentations: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Use οf the Forging Alliances in Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Research (FAIRR) Model to Develop an Intervention Using a Mixed Methods Approach.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2025Article
- Evidence based consensus statements for digital tools to address youth mental health literacy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- "How would you handle this?" The impact of embedding early patient and public involvement in a biomechanical computational engineering doctoral research project.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Implementation of project management methodologies in microbiology research laboratories.Access microbiology · 2025Article
- Building your research team: Insights on hiring, assembling, and leading research teams.JVS-vascular insights · 2025Article
- Designing and implementing solution-oriented team science initiatives-a chronic pain example.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interdisciplinary research teams can be extremely beneficial when addressing difficult clinical problems. The incorporation of conceptual and methodological strategies from a variety of research disciplines and health professions yields transformative results. In this setting, the long-term goal of team science is to improve patient care, with emphasis on population health outcomes. However, team principles necessary for effective research teams are rarely taught in health professional schools. To form successful interdisciplinary research teams in cardio-oncology and beyond, guiding principles and organizational recommendations are necessary. Cardiovascular disease results in annual direct costs of $220 billion (about $680 per person in the US) and is the leading cause of death for cancer survivors, including adult survivors of childhood cancers. Optimizing cardio-oncology research in interdisciplinary research teams has the potential to aid in the investigation of strategies for saving hundreds of thousands of lives each year in the United States and mitigating the annual cost of cardiovascular disease. Despite published reports on experiences developing research teams across organizations, specialties and settings, there is no single journal article that compiles principles for cardiology or cardio-oncology research teams. In this review, recurring threads linked to working as a team, as well as optimal methods, advantages, and problems that arise when managing teams are described in the context of career development and research. The worth and hurdles of a team approach, based on practical lessons learned from establishing our multidisciplinary research team and information gleaned from relevant specialties in the development of a successful team are presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.