ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Clinical significance of regional constructive and wasted work in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Novel echocardiographic tools for predicting a good response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have shown that global constructive work (CW) and wasted work (WW) predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This study evaluated the predictive value of regional CW and WW for reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes after CRT. Methods: We performed a prospective study involving 134 CRT candidates with left bundle branch block and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%. Global and regional CW and WW were calculated using pressure-strain loop analysis. CRT response was defined by reverse remodeling as a reduction of ≥15% in left ventricular end-systolic volume after six months. Results: At six-month follow-up, 92 (69%) patients responded to CRT. Of the regional CW and WW measures, lateral wall (LW) CW and septal WW were most strongly and significantly correlated with reverse remodeling. At multivariate analysis, LW CW and septal WW were both independent determinants of reverse remodeling. When LW CW and septal WW were included in the model, global CW and WW were not independently associated with reverse remodeling. LW CW and septal WW predicted reverse remodeling with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.783 (95% CI: 0.700-0.866) and 0.737 (95% CI: 0.644-0.831), respectively. Using both variables increased the AUC to 0.832 (95% CI: 0.755-0.908). Both LW CW ≤878 mmHg% (HR 2.01; 95% CI: 1.07-3.79) and septal WW ≤181 mmHg% (HR 2.60; 95% CI: 1.38-4.90) were significant predictors of combined death and HF hospitalization at two-year follow-up. Conclusion: LW CW and septal WW before CRT are important determinants of reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.