Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38510168›Full record

ArticleBiological imaging2023

Annotation-free learning of a spatio-temporal manifold of the cell life cycle.

Kristofer Delas Peñas, Mariia Dmitrieva, Dominic Waithe, Jens Rittscher

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristofer Delas PeñasDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0091-9431
Mariia DmitrievaDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Dominic WaitheWIMM Centre for Computational Biology, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jens RittscherDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of the Philippines System · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cell cycle is a complex biological phenomenon, which plays an important role in many cell biological processes and disease states. Machine learning is emerging to be a pivotal technique for the study of the cell cycle, resulting in a number of available tools and models for the analysis of the cell cycle. Most, however, heavily rely on expert annotations, prior knowledge of mechanisms, and imaging with several fluorescent markers to train their models. Many are also limited to processing only the spatial information in the cell images. In this work, we describe a different approach based on representation learning to construct a manifold of the cell life cycle. We trained our model such that the representations are learned without exhaustive annotations nor assumptions. Moreover, our model uses microscopy images derived from a single fluorescence channel and utilizes both the spatial and temporal information in these images. We show that even with fewer channels and self-supervision, information relevant to cell cycle analysis such as staging and estimation of cycle duration can still be extracted, which demonstrates the potential of our approach to aid future cell cycle studies and in discovery cell biology to probe and understand novel dynamic systems.

Indexed as

Cell life cyclemachine learningself-supervision

Identifiers

PMID38510168
PMCPMC10951929
OpenAlexW4387420158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.