Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38510164›Full record

ArticleBiological imaging2023

Bright-field to fluorescence microscopy image translation for cell nuclei health quantification.

Ruixiong Wang, Daniel Butt, Stephen Cross, Paul Verkade, Alin Achim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruixiong WangVisual Information Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1824-185X
Daniel ButtSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-1183
Stephen CrossWolfson Bioimaging Facility, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-0479
Paul VerkadeSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2497-1026
Alin AchimVisual Information Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0982-7798

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscopy is a widely used method in biological research to observe the morphology and structure of cells. Amongst the plethora of microscopy techniques, fluorescent labeling with dyes or antibodies is the most popular method for revealing specific cellular organelles. However, fluorescent labeling also introduces new challenges to cellular observation, as it increases the workload, and the process may result in nonspecific labeling. Recent advances in deep visual learning have shown that there are systematic relationships between fluorescent and bright-field images, thus facilitating image translation between the two. In this article, we propose the cross-attention conditional generative adversarial network (XAcGAN) model. It employs state-of-the-art GANs (GANs) to solve the image translation task. The model uses supervised learning and combines attention-based networks to explore spatial information during translation. In addition, we demonstrate the successful application of XAcGAN to infer the health state of translated nuclei from bright-field microscopy images. The results show that our approach achieves excellent performance both in terms of image translation and nuclei state inference.

Indexed as

attention networkfluorescent image translationGANnuclei classification

Identifiers

PMID38510164
PMCPMC10951917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.