Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38510113›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

Revealing

Qianru Yang, Alberto L Vazquez, X Tracy Cui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qianru YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Alberto L VazquezCenter for Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
X Tracy CuiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Carnegie Mellon University · USMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Inhibitory Neuron Sub-populations and Their Influence on Hemodynamic ImagingR01NS117515 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI VAZQUEZ, ALBERTO L · 2021 to 2025
$2.6M
Neural circuit basis for neurovascular couplingR01NS119410 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ROSS, SARAH ELIZABETH, VAZQUEZ, ALBERTO L · 2021 to 2025
$2.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS117515NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS119410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are associated with higher risk for various neurological diseases including stroke, dementia, and Alzheimer's disease. However, the understanding of cellular pathology of CMBs, particularly in deep brain regions, remains limited. Utilizing two-photon microscopy and microprism implantation, we longitudinally imaged the impact of CMBs on neuronal and microglial activities across cortical depths in awake mice. A temporary decline in spontaneous neuronal activity occurred throughout cortical layers, followed by recovery within a week. However, significant changes of neuron-neuron activity correlations persisted for weeks. Moreover, microglial contact with neuron soma significantly increased post-microbleeds, indicating an important modulatory role of microglia. Notably, microglial contact, negatively correlated with neuronal firing rate in normal conditions, became uncorrelated after microbleeds, suggesting a decreased neuron-microglia inhibition. These findings reveal chronic alterations in cortical neuronal networks and microglial-neuronal interactions across cortical depths, shedding light on the pathology of CMBs.

Indexed as

Cell biologyCellular neuroscienceMolecular neuroscienceNeuroscience

Identifiers

PMID38510113
PMCPMC10951986
OpenAlexW4392344795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.