ArticleHeliyon2024
Robust diagnosis recommendation system for Primary Care Telemedicine using long short-term memory multi-class sequence classification.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine offers opportunity for robust diagnoses recommendations to support healthcare providers intra-consultation in a way that does not limit providers ability to explore diagnostic codes and make the most appropriate selection for each consultation. Objective: The objective of this work was to develop a recommendation system for ICD-10 coding using multiclass sequence classification and deep learning. The recommendations are intended to support telemedicine clinicians in making timely and appropriate diagnosis selections. The recommendations allow clinicians to find and select the best diagnosis code much quicker and without leaving the telemedicine platform to search codes and code descriptions. Methods: We developed an LSTM model for multi-class text sequence classification to make diagnosis recommendations. The LSTM recommender used text-based Results: Using over 2.8 MM telemedicine consultations during 2021 and 2022, our LSTM recommender average accuracy was 31.7%. LSTM recommender average coverage in the top 20 recommended diagnoses was 85.8% with an average personalization score of 0.87. Conclusions: LSTM multi-class sequence classification recommends diagnoses specific to individual consultations, is retrainable on regular intervals, and could improve diagnoses recommendations such that providers require less time and resources searching for diagnosis codes. In addition, the LSTM recommender is robust enough to make recommendations across clinical specialties such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.