ReviewHeliyon2024
Development and advancements in rodent MRI-based brain atlases.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- In vivo imaging of central nervous system fluid spaces using synchrotron radiation-based micro computed tomography.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Exploring the Impact of 3-Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Flexible brain electronic sensors advance wearable brain-computer interface.npj biomedical innovations · 2025Review
- A novel minimally invasive stereotaxic technique to target inner ear neurons in the mouse.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rodents, particularly mice and rats, are extensively utilized in fundamental neuroscience research. Brain atlases have played a pivotal role in this field, evolving from traditional printed histology atlases to digital atlases incorporating diverse imaging datasets. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based brain atlases, also known as brain maps, have been employed in specific studies. However, the existence of numerous versions of MRI-based brain atlases has impeded their standardized application and widespread use, despite the consensus within the academic community regarding their significance in mice and rats. Furthermore, there is a dearth of comprehensive and systematic reviews on MRI-based brain atlases for rodents. This review aims to bridge this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of the advancements in MRI-based brain atlases for rodents, with a specific focus on mice and rats. It seeks to explore the advantages and disadvantages of histologically printed brain atlases in comparison to MRI brain atlases, delineate the standardized methods for creating MRI brain atlases, and summarize their primary applications in neuroscience research. Additionally, this review aims to assist researchers in selecting appropriate versions of MRI brain atlases for their studies or refining existing MRI brain atlas resources, thereby facilitating the development and widespread adoption of standardized MRI-based brain atlases in rodents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.