ArticleHeliyon2024
Mine water cooperative optimal scheduling based on improved genetic algorithm.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article addresses the issues of unreasonable water scheduling and high costs in coal mine shafts, proposing a hierarchical optimization scheduling strategy. Taking the water quality and quantity of a certain mining area in Inner Mongolia as the research object, it designs the objective function with the highest reuse efficiency and the lowest reuse cost of mine water resources, and establishes the constraint conditions of water quality and quantity for each water-using unit. In response to the problem that traditional genetic algorithms are prone to local optima, an adaptive autobiographical operator is proposed and improved based on Metropolis principle of simulated annealing algorithm. The improved algorithm is applied to the calculation of the scheduling model, and the results show that the recovery cost in the heating season is reduced by 66779.36 CNY/month, a decrease of 10.34%; the recovery cost in the non-heating season is reduced by 61469.28 CNY/month, a decrease of 9.91%. At the same time, the heating season and the non-heating season have reduced by 136.99 h/month and 154.52 h/month respectively, significantly reducing the recovery cost and time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.