Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38509993›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Self-perception of the acquisition of transferable competencies by the participants in a research congress for undergraduate students: A cross-sectional study.

Luis-A Arráez-Aybar, Javier Arias-Diaz, Sergio D Paredes, Pilar Zuluaga-Arias, Margarita Chevalier, Elena Salobrar-Garcia, Luis Collado, Olivia Hurtado, Pilar Fernández-Mateos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luis-A Arráez-AybarDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Javier Arias-DiazDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Sergio D ParedesDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Pilar Zuluaga-AriasStatistics & Operations Research Department, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Margarita ChevalierDepartment of Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Elena Salobrar-GarciaDepartment of Immunology, Ophthalmology and ENT, Faculty of Optics and Optometry, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Luis ColladoDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Olivia HurtadoDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Pilar Fernández-MateosInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Several curricular initiatives have been developed to improve the acquisition of research competencies by Health Science students. Objectives: To know how students self-perceived of whether their participation in the XIV National Research Congress for Undergraduate Students of Health Sciences had helped them in the acquisition of 36 research-related transferable competencies (TCs) common to Health Science degrees. Methods: A survey design (Cronbach's alpha = 0.924), using a self-administered questionnaire, was conducted among undergraduate students who voluntarily participated in the Congress. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 25 and Statgraphics 19. Statistical significance was considered for P < 0.05. Results: Eighty-one students from 12 Health Science degree programs responded. Key findings are presented in a structured manner, using a Likert-5 scale. Twenty-five of the competencies surveyed obtained an average ≥ 4 highlighting: "Critically evaluate and know how to use sources of clinical and biomedical information to obtain, organize, interpret, and communicate scientific and health information"; "To be able to formulate hypotheses, collect and critically evaluate information for problem solving, following the scientific method", "Critical analysis and research" and "Communicate effectively and clearly, orally and in writing with other professionals". Significance was found in 15 competencies. The development of the competencies "Teamwork", "Critical reasoning" and "Analysis and synthesis abilities" was considered to be of greater "personal utility" by the respondents. Conclusion: Participation in this event contributed to the development of research-related TCs, critical analysis and information management and communication, especially in relation to learning the sources of clinical and biomedical information, to know, following the scientific method, how to formulate hypotheses that allow students to solve problems in their professional activity. The experience was significantly influenced by the respondents' year, the type of participation in the event and the gender of the students. Limitations and suggestions regarding future research are discussed to encourage further exploration of the topic.

Indexed as

Critical thinkingInterprofessional educationResearch competencyTransferable competenciesUndergraduate health science research

Identifiers

PMID38509993
PMCPMC10951499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.