Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38509987›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Urine-derived stem cells: Promising advancements and applications in regenerative medicine and beyond.

Yao Sun, Huiying Zhao, Shuguang Yang, Guangjie Wang, Leijie Zhu, Chang Sun, Youzhong An

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Stem cell models in ataxia-telangiectasia.Neural regeneration research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yao SunDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, PR China.
Huiying ZhaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, PR China.
Shuguang YangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, PR China.
Guangjie WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, PR China.
Leijie ZhuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, PR China.
Chang SunDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, PR China.
Youzhong AnDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, stem cells are a prominent focus of regenerative engineering research. However, due to the limitations of commonly used stem cell sources, their application in therapy is often restricted to the experimental stage and constrained by ethical considerations. In contrast, urine-derived stem cells (USCs) offer promising advantages for clinical trials and applications. The noninvasive nature of the collection process allows for repeated retrieval within a short period, making it a more feasible option. Moreover, studies have shown that USCs have a protective effect on organs, promoting vascular regeneration, inhibiting oxidative stress, and reducing inflammation in various acute and chronic organ dysfunctions. The application of USCs has also been enhanced by advancements in biomaterials technology, enabling better targeting and controlled release capabilities. This review aims to summarize the current state of research on USCs, providing insights for future applications in basic and clinical settings.

Indexed as

Extracellular vesiclesHydrogelInduced pluripotent stem cellRegenerative engineeringUrine-derived stem cell

Identifiers

PMID38509987
PMCPMC10951541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.