ArticleHeliyon2024
Associations of toll-like receptor polymorphisms with systemic lupus erythematosus: A meta-analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Taking its TOLL: the role of toll-like receptor 4 in human health and disease, and its potential as a therapeutic target.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Review
- Discovery of Potent and Selective Quinoline-Based Toll-like Receptor 9 Antagonists.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to examine whether polymorphisms in toll-like receptors 7 and 4 (TLR7 and 4) contribute to vulnerability to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science for relevant articles and performed a meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between TLR7 rs179008, rs3853839, rs1790010, TLR4 rs4986791, and rs798690 polymorphisms and SLE. Results: Eighteen studies and 16 papers including 8022 patients with SLE and 9822 healthy controls were retrieved. Meta-analysis revealed that the TLR7 rs179008 T variant was not associated with SLE (OR = 1.008, 95% CI = 0.849-1.394, P = 0.504). Ethnic classification revealed no association between the TLR7 rs179008 T gene and SLE in either European or Latin American groups. Additionally, homozygous comparison, recessive, and dominant models revealed no association between the TLR7 rs179008 variant and SLE. In contrast, a significant association between SLE and the TLR7 rsrs3853839 GG + GA allele (OR = 2.135, 95% CI = 1.502-3.035, <0.001; OR = 23.20, 95% CI = 14.13-38.08, <0.001) was observed in the Arab and Asian groups. The T variant of TLR7 rsrs179010 was also associated with SLE in Asians (OR = 1.177, 95% CI = 1.048-1.321, P = 0.006). In contrast, the TLR4 rs4986791 variant was not associated with SLE in Europeans when allele, homozygous comparison, recessive, and dominant models were used. Furthermore, no association between the TLR4 rs4986790 variant and SLE risk in Europeans was found using any genomic model. Conclusions: Meta-analysis revealed that the TLR7 rs3853839 variant is associated with SLE risk in Asians and Arabs and that TLR7 rs179010 is associated with SLE in Asians. However, TLR7 rs179008, TLR4 rs4986791, and TLR rs798690 polymorphisms were not associated with SLE risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.