ArticleHeliyon2024
Goat milk extracellular vesicles: Separation comparison of natural carriers for theragnostic application.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Milk-Derived EVs from Different Animal Sources: An Overview on Their Detection, Isolation and Pleiotropic Exerted Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- RNAi delivery mediated by milk extracellular vesicles in colon cancer.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
- Goat Milk-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Alleviate Colitis Potentially Through Improved Gut Microbiota in Mice.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Milk-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: A Novel Perspective on Comparative Therapeutics and Targeted Nanocarrier Application.Vaccines · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Goat milk is a complex biological fluid, which in addition to having a high nutritional value, it is an interesting source of extracellular vesicles (EVs). Despite the countless potential applications that they offer in many biological fields, is not easy to compare the different proposed systems, and this is a major limitation for the real translatability of these natural nanoplatforms for theragnostic purposes. Thus, it is useful to further investigate reproducible methods to separate goat milk EVs. The choice of methods but also the preprocessing of milk has an immense impact on the separation, quality, and yield of EVs. Here, we tested four protocols to separate EVs from unpasteurised goat milk: two based on differential ultracentrifugation (DUC) and two on size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). Moreover, we assessed two different approaches of pre-treatment (acidification and precipitation) to facilitate milk protein discharge. To the best of our knowledge, a similar comparison of all performed protocols on raw goat milk has never been published before. Therefore, enriched EV samples were successfully obtained from goat milk using both DUC and SEC. Taken together, our results may be helpful to obtain natural carriers for future theragnostic applications in personalised medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.