Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38509707›Full record

ArticleSubstance use & misuse2024

Patterns in Tobacco, E-Cigarette, and Cannabis Advertising Exposure Among California Adolescents and Associations With Future Use Expectations.

Benjamin W Chaffee, Elizabeth T Couch, Candice D Donaldson, Omara Farooq, Nancy F Cheng, Niloufar Ameli, Xueying Zhang, Stuart A Gansky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance use & misuse, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benjamin W ChaffeeCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Elizabeth T CouchCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Candice D DonaldsonCalifornia Department of Public Health, CHC/California Tobacco Control Branch, California Tobacco Prevention Program, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Omara FarooqCalifornia Department of Public Health, CHC/California Tobacco Control Branch, California Tobacco Prevention Program, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Nancy F ChengDivision of Oral Epidemiology and Dental Public Health, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Niloufar AmeliDivision of Oral Epidemiology and Dental Public Health, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Xueying ZhangCalifornia Department of Public Health, CHC/California Tobacco Control Branch, California Tobacco Prevention Program, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Stuart A GanskyCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

PROJECT 5: IMPACT OF CHANGING TOBACCO PRODUCT USE ON HEALTHCARE COSTS FOR GENERAL AND VULNERABLE POPULATIONSU54HL147127 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LING, PAMELA MAY · 2018 to 2022
$20.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL147127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure to tobacco, e-cigarette, or cannabis marketing is associated with adolescent use. Few studies have examined advertising exposure prevalence and patterns across these products concurrently.

methodsThis study assessed past 30-day recalled exposure to promotional messages about tobacco, e-cigarettes ("vapes" on the survey), and cannabis ("marijuana") from various sources among California adolescents (ages 12-17) in the 2022 Teens, Nicotine, and Tobacco Online Survey (

resultsOverall, 65.9% of participants recently noticed at least one tobacco (52.5%), vape (51.5%), or marijuana (45.6%) advertisement. Gas stations or convenience stores were the most common source for tobacco or vape ads; billboards were for marijuana ads. In PCA, advertising exposure patterns correlated with advertising source, not the type of product. Exposures from tobacco-specific sources and nearer point of sale were associated with current use, older age, LGBTQ + identity, and sensation seeking. Among never-users, advertising exposure was associated with one-year and age-25 use expectations for cigarettes (one-year expectations adjusted odds ratio: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.5), vapes (2.3; 1.5, 3.5), and marijuana (2.1; 1.5, 3.0).

conclusionCalifornia adolescents' exposure to tobacco, e-cigarette, and cannabis marketing is common, follows similar patterns, and is associated with use susceptibility. Comprehensive restrictions on marketing accessible to adolescents could help prevent youth use.

Indexed as

AdvertisingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsVapingAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAdultCaliforniaCannabisChildFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco ProductsYoung Adultadolescent healthcannabiselectronic cigarettestobacco controlTobacco marketing

Identifiers

PMID38509707
PMCPMC11045304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.