ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2024
Automatic IMRT treatment planning through fluence prediction and plan fine-tuning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative study of three treatment approaches on overall survival and treatment response in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: network meta-analysis of RCTs (4221 patients).Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- End-to-end deep learning pipeline for automated IMRT planning in lymphoma: Feasibility and limitations.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Objective-function-guided automated VMAT planning reduces OAR dose, low-dose exposure, and inter-planner variability in breast radiotherapy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Feasibility and Tumor Dynamics of Daily MRI-Guided Online Adaptive Radiotherapy for Brain Glioma.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Observational
- A physics-informed deep learning model for predicting beam dose distribution of intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plans.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Deformable dose prediction network based on hybrid 2D and 3D convolution for nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
- MRI guided online adaptive radiotherapy and the dosimetric impact of inter- and intrafractional motion in patients with cervical cancer.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Pro-active risk analysis of an in-house developed deep learning based autoplanning tool for breast Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Challenges and opportunities to integrate artificial intelligence in radiation oncology: a narrative review.Ewha medical journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAt present, the implementation of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning for geometrically complex nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) through manual trial-and-error fashion presents challenges to the improvement of planning efficiency and the obtaining of high-consistency plan quality. This paper aims to propose an automatic IMRT plan generation method through fluence prediction and further plan fine-tuning for patients with NPC and evaluates the planning efficiency and plan quality.
methodsA total of 38 patients with NPC treated with nine-beam IMRT were enrolled in this study and automatically re-planned with the proposed method. A trained deep learning model was employed to generate static field fluence maps for each patient with 3D computed tomography images and structure contours as input. Automatic IMRT treatment planning was achieved by using its generated dose with slight tightening for further plan fine-tuning. Lastly, the plan quality was compared between automatic plans and clinical plans.
resultsThe average time for automatic plan generation was less than 4 min, including fluence maps prediction with a python script and automated plan tuning with a C# script. Compared with clinical plans, automatic plans showed better conformity and homogeneity for planning target volumes (PTVs) except for the conformity of PTV-1. Meanwhile, the dosimetric metrics for most organs at risk (OARs) were ameliorated in the automatic plan, especially D
conclusionWe have successfully implemented an automatic IMRT plan generation method for patients with NPC. This method shows high planning efficiency and comparable or superior plan quality than clinical plans. The qualitative results before and after the plan fine-tuning indicates that further optimization using dose objectives generated by predicted fluence maps is crucial to obtain high-quality automatic plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.