Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38509540›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2024

Automatic IMRT treatment planning through fluence prediction and plan fine-tuning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Wenwen Cai, Shouliang Ding, Huali Li, Xuanru Zhou, Wen Dou, Linghong Zhou, Ting Song, Yongbao Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wenwen Cai *School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Shouliang Ding *Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Huali LiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Xuanru ZhouSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Wen DouZhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282, China.
Linghong ZhouSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Ting SongSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China. tingsong2015@smu.edu.cn.
Yongbao LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, 510060, China. liyb1@sysucc.org.cn.
Southern Medical University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNZhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, China 2021A1515012044Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, China 2022A1515010639Guangzhou Science and Technology Foundation, China SL2022A04J01215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt present, the implementation of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning for geometrically complex nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) through manual trial-and-error fashion presents challenges to the improvement of planning efficiency and the obtaining of high-consistency plan quality. This paper aims to propose an automatic IMRT plan generation method through fluence prediction and further plan fine-tuning for patients with NPC and evaluates the planning efficiency and plan quality.

methodsA total of 38 patients with NPC treated with nine-beam IMRT were enrolled in this study and automatically re-planned with the proposed method. A trained deep learning model was employed to generate static field fluence maps for each patient with 3D computed tomography images and structure contours as input. Automatic IMRT treatment planning was achieved by using its generated dose with slight tightening for further plan fine-tuning. Lastly, the plan quality was compared between automatic plans and clinical plans.

resultsThe average time for automatic plan generation was less than 4 min, including fluence maps prediction with a python script and automated plan tuning with a C# script. Compared with clinical plans, automatic plans showed better conformity and homogeneity for planning target volumes (PTVs) except for the conformity of PTV-1. Meanwhile, the dosimetric metrics for most organs at risk (OARs) were ameliorated in the automatic plan, especially D

conclusionWe have successfully implemented an automatic IMRT plan generation method for patients with NPC. This method shows high planning efficiency and comparable or superior plan quality than clinical plans. The qualitative results before and after the plan fine-tuning indicates that further optimization using dose objectives generated by predicted fluence maps is crucial to obtain high-quality automatic plans.

Indexed as

Nasopharyngeal NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedHumansNasopharyngeal CarcinomaOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedAutomatic planningFluence predictionIMRTNasopharyngeal carcinomaPlan fine-tuning

Identifiers

PMID38509540
PMCPMC10956235
OpenAlexW4392986260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.