ReviewReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2024
Predictive models of recurrent implantation failure in patients receiving ART treatment based on clinical features and routine laboratory data.
Review in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determining risk factors predicting miscarriage among couples undergoing assisted reproductive treatment: a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- Incidence of pregnancy outcomes among patients with recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- Antinuclear Antibodies in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Homozygous C12orf40 variant contributes to severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia and sperm sex chromosome aneuploidy.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Cell-free DNA in female infertility: from pathological mechanisms to clinical biomarkers.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Identifying cycle-specific predictive factors for clinical pregnancy after recurrent implantation failure: a retrospective cohort study.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Article
- Endometrial immune dysregulation shapes CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- An early prediction model for high-quality blastocyst development based on ANA titer and baseline demographic characteristics in the first IVF/ICSI cycle.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- Correction: Predictive models of recurrent implantation failure in patients receiving ART treatment based on clinical features and routine laboratory data.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024Article
- Correction: Predictive models of recurrent implantation failure in patients receiving ART treatment based on clinical features and routine laboratory data.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
study questionThe objective was to construct a model for predicting the probability of recurrent implantation failure (RIF) after assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment based on the clinical characteristics and routine laboratory test data of infertile patients. A model was developed to predict RIF. The model showed high calibration in external validation, helped to identify risk factors for RIF, and improved the efficacy of ART therapy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Research on the influencing factors of RIF has focused mainly on embryonic factors, endometrial receptivity, and immune factors. However, there are many kinds of examinations regarding these aspects, and comprehensive screening is difficult because of the limited time and economic conditions. Therefore, we should try our best to analyse the results of routine infertility screenings to make general predictions regarding the occurrence of RIF. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A retrospective study was conducted with 5212 patients at the Reproductive Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC from January 2018 to June 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsThis study included 462 patients in the RIF group and 4750 patients in the control group. The patients' basic characteristics, clinical treatment data, and laboratory test indices were compared. Logistic regression was used to analyse RIF-related risk factors, and the prediction model was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the corresponding areas under the curve (AUCs). Further analysis of the influencing factors of live births in the first cycle of subsequent assisted reproduction treatment in RIF patients was performed, including the live birth subgroup (n = 116) and the no live birth subgroup (n = 200). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: (1) An increased duration of infertility (1.978; 95% CI, 1.264-3.097), uterine cavity abnormalities (2.267; 95% CI, 1.185-4.336), low AMH levels (0.504; 95% CI, 0.275-0.922), insulin resistance (3.548; 95% CI, 1.931-6.519), antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive status (3.249; 95% CI, 1.20-8.797) and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibody (A-β2-GPI Ab)-positive status (5.515; 95% CI, 1.481-20.536) were associated with an increased risk of RIF. The area under the curve of the logistic regression model was 0.900 (95% CI, 0.870-0.929) for the training cohort and 0.895 (95% CI, 0.865-0.925) for the testing cohort. (2) Advanced age (1.069; 95% CI, 1.015-1.126) was a risk factor associated with no live births after the first cycle of subsequent assisted reproduction treatment in patients with RIF. Blastocyst transfer (0.365; 95% CI = 0.181-0.736) increased the probability of live birth in subsequent cycles in patients with RIF. The area under the curve of the logistic regression model was 0.673 (95% CI, 0.597-0.748). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This was a single-centre regression study, for which the results need to be evaluated and verified by prospective large-scale randomized controlled studies. The small sample size for the analysis of factors influencing pregnancy outcomes in subsequent assisted reproduction cycles for RIF patients resulted in the inclusion of fewer covariates, and future studies with larger samples and the inclusion of more factors are needed for assessment and validation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsPrediction of embryo implantation prior to transfer will facilitate the clinical management of patients and disease prediction and further improve ART treatment outcomes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by the General Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 82,201,792, 82,301,871, 81,971,446, and 82,374,212) and the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (No. 2208085MH206). There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Register (Clinical Trial Number: ChiCTR1800018298 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.