Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38509530›Full record

SynthesisBMC oral health2024

Accuracy of implant placement with computer-aided static, dynamic, and robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Angkoon Khaohoen, Warit Powcharoen, Tanapon Sornsuwan, Pisaisit Chaijareenont, Chaiy Rungsiyakull, Pimduen Rungsiyakull

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06967090 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Accuracy of Guided Implant Placement Using Artificial Intelligence Segmentation Versus Conventional Technique: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFayoum UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsDental ImplantArmsImplant surgery using surgical guide
NCT07315607 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

In Vivo Evaluation of the Accuracy of Immediate Screw-Retained Provisional Crowns Prefabricated Using Digital Planning and Fully Guided Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Complutense de MadridRan2026 to 2027Enrolled27ConditionsPartial Edentulism, Tooth Loss / RehabilitationArmsFully Guided Implant Placement and Immediate Provisionalization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angkoon KhaohoenDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Warit PowcharoenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Tanapon SornsuwanDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, 65000, Thailand.
Pisaisit ChaijareenontDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Chaiy RungsiyakullDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Pimduen RungsiyakullDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. pimduen.rungsiyakull@cmu.ac.th.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review explores the accuracy of computerized guided implant placement including computer-aided static, dynamic, and robot-assisted surgery. An electronic search up to February 28, 2023, was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases using the search terms "surgery", "computer-assisted", "dynamic computer-assisted", "robotic surgical procedures", and "dental implants". The outcome variables were discrepancies including the implant's 3D-coronal, -apical and -angular deviations. Articles were selectively retrieved according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the data were quantitatively meta-analysed to verify the study outcomes. Sixty-seven articles were finally identified and included for analysis. The accuracy comparison revealed an overall mean deviation at the entry point of 1.11 mm (95% CI: 1.02-1.19), and 1.40 mm (95% CI: 1.31-1.49) at the apex, and the angulation was 3.51˚ (95% CI: 3.27-3.75). Amongst computerized guided implant placements, the robotic system tended to show the lowest deviation (0.81 mm in coronal deviation, 0.77 mm in apical deviation, and 1.71˚ in angular deviation). No significant differences were found between the arch type and flap operation in cases of dynamic navigation. The fully-guided protocol demonstrated a significantly higher level of accuracy compared to the pilot-guided protocol, but did not show any significant difference when compared to the partially guided protocol. The use of computerized technology clinically affirms that operators can accurately place implants in three directions. Several studies agree that a fully guided protocol is the gold standard in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Dental Implantation, EndosseousRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgery, Computer-AssistedClinical Trials as TopicDental ImplantsHumansDental ImplantsComputer-assisted implantationDental implantsImage-guided surgeryRobotic guide surgerySurgical navigationSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38509530
PMCPMC10956322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.