Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38509505›Full record

ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2024

Breastfeeding in primiparous women with congenital heart disease - a register study.

Ylva Holstad, Bengt Johansson, Maria Lindqvist, Agneta Westergren, Inger Sundström Poromaa, Christina Christersson, Mikael Dellborg, Aleksandra Trzebiatowska-Krzynska, Peder Sörensson, Ulf Thilén and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ylva HolstadDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. ylva.holstad@umu.se.
Bengt JohanssonDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Maria LindqvistDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Agneta WestergrenDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Inger Sundström PoromaaDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Christina ChristerssonDepartment of Medical Science, Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mikael DellborgDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Aleksandra Trzebiatowska-KrzynskaDepartment of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Peder SörenssonDepartment of Medicine, Solna, Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ulf ThilénDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Cardiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anna-Karin WikströmDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Annika BayDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Umeå University · SEUppsala University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SELinköping University · SELund University · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of pregnant women with congenital heart disease (CHD) is rising, and the disease poses increased risks of cardiovascular and obstetric complications during pregnancy, potentially impacting breastfeeding success. This study aimed to investigate breastfeeding in primiparous women with CHD compared to primiparous women without CHD, and to examine potential hindering factors for breastfeeding in women with CHD.

methodsThe data were gathered between 2014 and 2019 and obtained by merging the Swedish Congenital Heart Disease Register (SWEDCON) with the Swedish Pregnancy Register. Primiparous women ≥ 18 years of age with CHD (n = 578) were matched by age and municipality to 3049 women without CHD, giving birth after 22 gestational weeks. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with non-breastfeeding in women with CHD.

resultsFewer women with CHD breastfed than women without CHD two days (94% vs. 97%, p = 0.001) and four weeks after birth (84% vs. 89%, p = 0.006). When all women were analysed, having CHD was associated with non-breastfeeding at both two days and four weeks after birth. For women with CHD, body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.4, 7.3), preterm birth (OR 6.4; 95% CI 2.1, 19.0), self-reported history of psychiatric illness (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.2, 5.1), small for gestational age (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.4, 12.2), and New York Heart Association Stages of Heart Failure class II - III (OR 6.0; 95% CI 1.4, 26.7) were associated with non-breastfeeding two days after birth. Four weeks after birth, factors associated with non-breastfeeding were BMI ≥ 30 (OR 4.3; 95% CI 2.1, 9.0), self-reported history of psychiatric illness (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.2, 4.2), and preterm birth (OR 8.9; 95% CI 2.8, 27.9).

conclusionsThe study shows that most women with CHD breastfeed, however, at a slightly lower proportion compared to women without CHD. In addition, factors related to the heart disease were not associated with non-breastfeeding four weeks after birth. Since preterm birth, BMI ≥ 30, and psychiatric illness are associated with non-breastfeeding, healthcare professionals should provide greater support to women with CHD having these conditions.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalPremature BirthBreast FeedingFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeParityPregnancyBreastfeedingHeart defects congenitalMaternal healthPostpartum period, adult congenital heart disease (ACHD)

Identifiers

PMID38509505
PMCPMC10956229
OpenAlexW4392997316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.