Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38509492›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2024

Clinical characteristics and radiation therapy modality of younger patients with early-stage endometrial cancer, a multicenter study in China's real world.

Kun Zhang, Tiejun Wang, Zi Liu, Jianli He, Xiaoge Sun, Wei Zhong, Fengjv Zhao, Xiaomei Li, Sha Li, Hong Zhu and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Kun ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chin ese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Tiejun WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The second hospital Affiliated by Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.
Zi LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Jianli HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoge SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China.
Wei ZhongGynaecological Oncology Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, People's Republic of China.
Fengjv ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, People's Republic of China.
Xiaomei LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Sha LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Lanzhou, Gansu, People's Republic of China.
Hong ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Zhanshu MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Chi feng University, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China.
Ke HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chin ese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Fuquan ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chin ese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaorong HouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chin ese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, People's Republic of China. hxr_pumch@163.com.
Lichun WeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University of PLA (the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China. weilichun@fmmu.edu.cn.
Lijuan ZouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People's Republic of China. suxindai@163.com.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital · CNCentral South University · CNChifeng University · CNChinese People's Liberation Army · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNGansu Provincial Hospital · CNInner Mongolia Medical University · CNNingxia Medical University · CNPeking University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CNXijing Hospital · CNXinjiang Medical University · CN

Funding

Peking Union Medical College Hospital 2022-PUMCH-A-036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometrial cancer is a prevalent gynecologic malignancy found in postmenopausal women. However, in the last two decades, the incidence of early-stage has doubled in women under 40 years old. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and pathological characteristics and adjuvant therapeutic modalities of both young and not -young patients with early-stage endometrial cancer in China's real world.

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed patients with early-stage endometrial cancer at 13 medical institutions in China from 1999 to 2015. The patients were divided into two groups: young (≤ 45 years old) and non-young (> 45 years old). Statistical comparisons were conducted between the two groups for clinical characteristics, pathological features, and survival. The study also identified factors that affect local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) using Cox proportional risk regression analysis. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to compare the effects of local control between vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) alone and pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) ± VBT.

resultsThe study involved 1,280 patients, 150 of whom were 45 years old or younger. The young group exhibited a significantly higher proportion of stage II, low-risk, lower uterine segment infiltration (LUSI), and cervical invasion compared to the non-young group. Additionally, the young patients had significantly larger maximum tumor diameters. The young group also had a significantly higher five-year overall survival (OS) and a five-year LRFS. Age is an independent risk factor for LRFS. There was no significant difference in LRFS between young patients with intermediate- to high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer who received EBRT ± VBT and those who received VBT alone.

conclusionsIn the present study, young patients had better characteristics than the non-young group, while they exhibited higher levels of aggressiveness in certain aspects. The LRFS and OS outcomes were better in young patients. Age is an independent risk factor for LRFS. Additionally, VBT alone may be a suitable option for patients under 45 years of age with intermediate- to high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer, as it reduces the risk of toxic reactions and future second cancers while maintaining similar local control as EBRT.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyEndometrial NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesVaginaEBRTEndometrial neoplasmsRadiotherapySurvival analysisVBTYoung

Identifiers

PMID38509492
PMCPMC10956334
OpenAlexW4392978853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.