Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38509427›Full record

SynthesisEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2024

A systematic review of the psychometric properties of tools for measuring depression in youths with intellectual disability.

Xavier Benarous, Sandy Walesa, Jean-Marc Guilé, Cora Cravero, Angèle Consoli, David Cohen, Héloïse Young, Real Labelle, Hélène Lahaye

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xavier BenarousPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France. xavier.benarous@aphp.fr.
Sandy WalesaAmiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Jean-Marc GuiléAmiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Cora CraveroPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Angèle ConsoliPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
David CohenPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Héloïse YoungRouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Real LabelleUniversité du Québec À Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Hélène LahayeAmiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While youths with intellectual disability (ID) have increased vulnerability for depressive disorders, cognitive problems and combined functional barriers make them less prone to receive adequate treatments. A systematic review of the literature was conducted (PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42022347703) based on several databases from 1980 to 2022 to examine the quality of tools for measuring depression in children and adolescents with ID. The COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) checklist was used to assess several psychometric domains. Twelve studies evaluated the properties of six tools for measuring depression in youths with ID. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-Intellectual Disability (CESD-ID) was the only scale with at least five domains of psychometric properties assessed to have strong or moderate evidence. Based on the reviewed findings, tools specifically developed for populations with developmental disabilities should be considered first in order to screen depression in youths with ID. Much work is required to confirm their validity in clinical samples with patients with a complex form of developmental disabilities. As a complement to self- and caregivers-report questionnaires, clinician rating scales were considered useful to catch the full picture of depression in youths with ID, in particular associated behavioral expressions. Their validity received little scrutiny and certainly deserve more attention to improve care practice of youths with ID.

Indexed as

Intellectual DisabilityPsychometricsAdolescentChildDepressionDepressive DisorderHumansPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesDepressive disordersDevelopmental disabilityIntellectual and developmental disorderIntellectual disabilityIrritabilityMood disorders

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.