Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38509415›Full record

Observational studyGeroScience2024

Detecting aortic valve stenosis based on the non-invasive blood pressure waveform-a proof of concept study.

Eline Kho, Jimmy Schenk, Alexander P J Vlaar, Marije M Vis, Marije Wijnberge, Lotte B Stam, Martijn van Mourik, Harald T Jorstad, Henning Hermanns, Berend E Westerhof and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in GeroScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03088787 (Feasibility of Continuous Noninvasive Finger Arterial Blood Pressure Measurement for Detection and Staging of Aortic Stenosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03088787 unknown statusnot on this map

Feasibility of Continuous Noninvasive Finger Arterial Blood Pressure Measurement for Detection and Staging of Aortic Stenosis

TypeobservationalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2017 to 2018Enrolled100ConditionsAortic Stenosis, CalcificArmsNexfin measuremtents
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Eline KhoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jimmy SchenkDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Alexander P J VlaarDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marije M VisDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marije WijnbergeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lotte B StamDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Martijn van MourikDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Harald T JorstadDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Henning HermannsDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Berend E WesterhofDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Denise P Veelo *Department of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. d.p.veelo@amsterdamumc.nl.
Bjorn J P van der Ster *Department of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of aortic valve stenosis (AoS) increases with age, and once diagnosed, symptomatic severe AoS has a yearly mortality rate of 25%. AoS is diagnosed with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), however, this gold standard is time consuming and operator and acoustic window dependent. As AoS affects the arterial blood pressure waveform, AoS-specific waveform features might serve as a diagnostic tool. Aim of the present study was to develop a novel, non-invasive, AoS detection model based on blood pressures waveforms. This cross-sectional study included patients with AoS undergoing elective transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement. AoS was determined using TTE, and patients with no or mild AoS were labelled as patients without AoS, while patients with moderate or severe AoS were labelled as patients with AoS. Non-invasive blood pressure measurements were performed in awake patients. Ten minutes of consecutive data was collected. Several blood pressure-based features were derived, and the median, interquartile range, variance, and the 1st and 9th decile of the change of these features were calculated. The primary outcome was the development of a machine-learning model for AoS detection, investigating multiple classifiers and training on the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC). In total, 101 patients with AoS and 48 patients without AoS were included. Patients with AoS showed an increase in left ventricular ejection time (0.02 s, p = 0.001), a delayed maximum upstroke in the systolic phase (0.015 s, p < 0.001), and a delayed maximal systolic pressure (0.03 s, p < 0.001) compared to patients without AoS. With the logistic regression model, a sensitivity of 0.81, specificity of 0.67, and AUROC of 0.79 were found. The majority of the population without AoS was male (85%), whereas in the population with AoS this was evenly distributed (54% males). Age was significantly (5 years, p < 0.001) higher in the population with AoS. In the present study, we developed a novel model able to distinguish no to mild AoS from moderate to severe AoS, based on blood pressure features with high accuracy. Clinical registration number: The study entailing patients with TAVR treatment was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03088787, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03088787 ). The study with elective cardiac surgery patients was registered with the Netherland Trial Register (NL7810, https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL7810 ).

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisProof of Concept StudyAgedAged, 80 and overBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationCross-Sectional StudiesEchocardiographyFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleROC CurveTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAortic valve stenosisBlood pressureNexfinNon-invasive blood pressurePrediction model

Identifiers

PMID38509415
PMCPMC11493879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.