ArticleOdontology2024
Evaluation of residual dentin thickness using quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology.
Article in Odontology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to determine whether a correlation exists between residual dentin thickness and quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) values and, if so, to analyze its tendencies. Forty extracted sound human molars were assigned to filled and unfilled groups. The teeth were submerged in a mold with clear acrylic resin. Red utility wax was inserted into the pulp chamber space in the filled group to simulate vital pulp. The specimen was sectioned longitudinally to observe the inside of the pulp space. The samples were cut horizontally from the highest point of the pulp space 2 mm apart. QLF images were then taken of 2 mm, 1 mm, and 0.5 mm samples using the QLF-D Biluminator™ 2 + system. Three operators independently evaluated the QLF images, and the statistical analysis was conducted using one-way analysis of variance, Pearson correlation coefficients, and intraclass correlation coefficients. In the filled group, the mean ΔF values for residual dentin thicknesses of 2 mm, 1 mm, and 0.5 mm were - 3.22, - 7.84, and - 11.52, respectively. In the unfilled group, the mean ΔF values were 0, - 6.90, and - 10.14, respectively. A positive correlation was found between residual dentin thickness and ΔF values (P < 0.05). The intraclass correlation coefficients for observations made by the three operators for the filled and unfilled groups were 0.831 and 0.917, respectively (P < 0.05). In conclusion, residual dentin thickness and ΔF values were significantly correlated and had a highly positive correlation regardless of the QLF device operator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38509319What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.