Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38509248›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2024

Evaluation of the usefulness of insertion-null markers in critical skeletal remains.

Christian Haarkötter, María Saiz, Xiomara Gálvez, Diana C Vinueza-Espinosa, María Isabel Medina-Lozano, Juan Carlos Álvarez, Jose Antonio Lorente

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christian HaarkötterLaboratory of Genetic Identification & Human Rights (LABIGEN-UGR), Department of Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Av. Investigación 11 - PTS - 18016, Granada, Spain.
María SaizLaboratory of Genetic Identification & Human Rights (LABIGEN-UGR), Department of Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Av. Investigación 11 - PTS - 18016, Granada, Spain.
Xiomara GálvezLaboratory of Genetic Identification & Human Rights (LABIGEN-UGR), Department of Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Av. Investigación 11 - PTS - 18016, Granada, Spain.
Diana C Vinueza-EspinosaLaboratory of Genetic Identification & Human Rights (LABIGEN-UGR), Department of Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Av. Investigación 11 - PTS - 18016, Granada, Spain.
María Isabel Medina-LozanoLaboratory of Genetic Identification & Human Rights (LABIGEN-UGR), Department of Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Av. Investigación 11 - PTS - 18016, Granada, Spain.
Juan Carlos ÁlvarezLaboratory of Genetic Identification & Human Rights (LABIGEN-UGR), Department of Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Av. Investigación 11 - PTS - 18016, Granada, Spain. juanca@ugr.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5884-9918
Jose Antonio LorenteLaboratory of Genetic Identification & Human Rights (LABIGEN-UGR), Department of Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Av. Investigación 11 - PTS - 18016, Granada, Spain.

Funding

Ministerio de Universidades FPU 20/01967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic DNA analysis in compromised skeletal remains may pose challenges due to DNA degradation, often resulting in partial or negative autosomal STRs profiles. To address this issue, alternative approaches such as mitochondrial DNA or SNPs typing may be employed; however, they are labour-intensive and costly. Insertion-null alleles (INNULs), short interspersed nuclear elements, have been suggested as a valuable tool for human identification in challenging samples due to their small amplicon size. A commercial kit including 20 INNULs markers along with amelogenin (InnoTyper® 21) has been developed. This study assesses its utility using degraded skeletal remains, comparing the results obtained (the number of detected alleles, RFU values, PHR, and the number of reportable markers) to those obtained using GlobalFiler™. Subsequently, the random match probability of the two profiles for each sample was determined using Familias version 3 to evaluate the power of discrimination of the results obtained from each kit. In every sample, InnoTyper® 21 yielded more alleles, higher RFU values, and a greater number of reportable loci. However, in most cases, both profiles were similarly informative. In conclusion, InnoTyper® 21 serves as a valuable complement to the analysis of challenging samples in cases where a poor or negative profile was obtained.

Indexed as

Body RemainsDNA FingerprintingAllelesAmelogeninDNA Degradation, NecroticGenetic MarkersHumansMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymerase Chain ReactionShort Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsAmelogeninGenetic MarkersForensic GeneticsHuman remainsINNULsRetrotransposable elementsSTRs

Identifiers

PMID38509248
PMCPMC11164766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.