Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38509194›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Stimulus type and duration affect magnitude and evolution of flicker-induced hyperemia measured by laser speckle flowgraphy at the optic disc and peripapillary vessels.

Moe H Aung, Tomas S Aleman, Arielle S Garcia, Brendan McGeehan, Gui-Shuang Ying, Robert A Avery

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Moe H AungDepartments of Neurology, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. moe.aung@austin.utexas.edu.
Tomas S AlemanDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Arielle S GarciaDivision of Ophthalmology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Brendan McGeehanDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gui-Shuang YingDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robert A AveryDepartments of Neurology, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CLAIRE H MITCHELL · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583NIH HHS P30 EY001583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurovascular coupling is a vital mechanism employed by the cerebrovascular system, including the eye, to regulate blood flow in periods of neuronal activation. This study aims to investigate if laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) can detect coupling response elicited by flickering light stimuli and how variations in stimulus type and duration can affect the magnitude and evolution of blood flow in the optic nerve head (ONH) and peripapillary vessels. Healthy adults were exposed to two types of 10-Hz flicker stimuli: a photopic negative response-like stimulus (PhNR-S) or a visual evoked potential-like stimulus (VEP-S)-each presented in separate 10- and 60-s epochs. Both PhNR-S and VEP-S significantly increased ONH blood flow (p < 0.001) immediately after flicker cessation, with a trend of 60-s stimuli (PhNR-S = 11.6%; VEP-S = 10.4%) producing a larger response than 10-s stimuli (PhNR-S = 7.5%; VEP-S = 6.2%). Moreover, exposure to 60-s stimuli elicited a significantly prolonged ONH hyperemic response, especially with PhNR-S. Lastly, stimulation with either 60-s stimuli elicited a robust increase in blood flow within the peripapillary arterioles (p < 0.01) and venules (p < 0.01) as well. Flicker stimulation with common visual electrophysiology stimuli (PhNR-S and VEP-S) induced a demonstrable increase in ONH and peripapillary vessel blood flow, which varied with flicker duration. Our results validate that LSFG is a robust method to quantify flicker-induced hyperemic responses and to study neurovascular coupling in humans.

Indexed as

HyperemiaOptic DiskAdultBlood Flow VelocityEvoked Potentials, VisualHumansLaser-Doppler FlowmetryLasersPhotic StimulationRegional Blood FlowFlicker-induced hyperemiaFunctional hyperemiaLaser speckle flowgraphyNeurovascular couplingOptic nerve head

Identifiers

PMID38509194
PMCPMC10954713
OpenAlexW4393010030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.