ArticleScientific reports2024
Changes in use and outcomes after fibrinogen concentrate insurance coverage for critical obstetrical hemorrhage: a nationwide questionnaire survey in Japan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proposals for Improving Maternal Safety (2024 Edition): Insights From the Analysis of Maternal Deaths in Japan.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2026Article
- New approaches in the haemostatic management of postpartum haemorrhage.BMJ medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fibrinogen concentrate (FC) for acquired hypofibrinogenemia associated with critical obstetrical hemorrhage (COH) was covered by public medical insurance in September 2021 in Japan. We aimed to investigate changes in the policy of FC use and its effect on COH after insurance coverage. A primary survey covering September 2020 to August 2021 and a secondary survey covering September 2021 to August 2022 were conducted at 428 higher-level medical facilities. We investigated the policy of FC use in transfusion strategy and the maternal outcomes in COH. Among the hospitals that responded to both surveys, the number of facilities that use FC increased from 51.5 (101/196) to 78.6% (154/196) (P < 0.0001). The number of COH cases treated using FC increased from 14.3 to 24.3% (P < 0.0001) and that transfused with ≥ 10 units of red blood cells (RBCs) decreased from 36.8 to 29.8% (P = 0.001). The incidence of pulmonary edema reduced by 3.7-2.0% (P = 0.021), and transfusion-induced allergy by 1.9-0.7% (P = 0.008). No changes were observed in the incidence of thromboembolism, arterial embolization, or hysterectomy. The increased use of FC after insurance coverage led to changes in the transfusion strategy, which may be associated with decreases in transfusions of RBCs, pulmonary edema, and transfusion-induced allergies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.