Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38509145›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Preponderance of generalized chain functions in reconstructed Boolean models of biological networks.

Suchetana Mitra, Priyotosh Sil, Ajay Subbaroyan, Olivier C Martin, Areejit Samal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suchetana Mitra *Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Mohali, Manauli, Punjab, 140306, India.
Priyotosh Sil *The Institute of Mathematical Sciences (IMSc), Chennai, 600113, India.
Ajay Subbaroyan *The Institute of Mathematical Sciences (IMSc), Chennai, 600113, India.
Olivier C MartinUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, INRAE, Univ Evry, Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), 91405, Orsay, France. olivier.c.martin@inrae.fr.
Areejit SamalThe Institute of Mathematical Sciences (IMSc), Chennai, 600113, India. asamal@imsc.res.in.

Funding

Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India Apex Project to The Institute of Mathematical Sciences (IMSc), ChennaiMax-Planck-Gesellschaft Max Planck Partner Group
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Boolean networks (BNs) have been extensively used to model gene regulatory networks (GRNs). The dynamics of BNs depend on the network architecture and regulatory logic rules (Boolean functions (BFs)) associated with nodes. Nested canalyzing functions (NCFs) have been shown to be enriched among the BFs in the large-scale studies of reconstructed Boolean models. The central question we address here is whether that enrichment is due to certain sub-types of NCFs. We build on one sub-type of NCFs, the chain functions (or chain-0 functions) proposed by Gat-Viks and Shamir. First, we propose two other sub-types of NCFs, namely, the class of chain-1 functions and generalized chain functions, the union of the chain-0 and chain-1 types. Next, we find that the fraction of NCFs that are chain-0 (also holds for chain-1) functions decreases exponentially with the number of inputs. We provide analytical treatment for this and other observations on BFs. Then, by analyzing three different datasets of reconstructed Boolean models we find that generalized chain functions are significantly enriched within the NCFs. Lastly we illustrate that upon imposing the constraints of generalized chain functions on three different GRNs we are able to obtain biologically viable Boolean models.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksModels, GeneticAlgorithmsLogicModels, BiologicalBoolean networksChain functionGene regulatory networksNested canalyzing functionRelative enrichmentUpdate rules

Identifiers

PMID38509145
PMCPMC10954731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.