Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38509085›Full record

ArticleNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2024

Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG ameliorates hyperuricemia in a novel model.

Yang Fu, Yong-Song Chen, Dai-Yang Xia, Xiao-Dan Luo, Hao-Tong Luo, Jie Pan, Wei-Qing Ma, Jin-Ze Li, Qian-Yuan Mo, Qiang Tu and 24 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. DietaryAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Yang Fu *State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8106-4510
Yong-Song Chen *Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, China.
Dai-Yang Xia *School of Marine Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, and Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519082, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2688-6474
Xiao-Dan Luo *State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Hao-Tong LuoState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Jie PanHunan Shihua Biotech Co. Ltd., Changsha, 410000, China.
Wei-Qing MaState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Jin-Ze LiState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Qian-Yuan MoState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Qiang TuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, Shandong, China.
Meng-Meng LiSchool of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, 252000, China.
Yue ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Yu LiState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Yi-Teng HuangClinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, China.
Zhi-Xian ChenClinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, China.
Zhen-Jun LiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Departments of Lymphoma, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100080, China.
Lukuyu BernardInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Michel DioneInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
You-Ming ZhangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, Shandong, China.
Kai MiaoCancer Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, SAR, China.
Jian-Ying ChenState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Shan-Shan ZhuState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Jie RenDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Ling-Juan ZhouState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Xian-Zhi JiangMicrobiome Research Center, Moon (Guangzhou) Biotech Co. Ltd., Guangzhou, 510535, China.
Juan ChenMicrobiome Research Center, Moon (Guangzhou) Biotech Co. Ltd., Guangzhou, 510535, China.
Zhen-Ping LinShantou Baisha Research Institute of Origin Species of Poultry and Stock, Shantou, 515041, China.
Jun-Peng ChenShantou Baisha Research Institute of Origin Species of Poultry and Stock, Shantou, 515041, China.
Hui YeState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Qing-Yun CaoState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Yong-Wen ZhuState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Lin YangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China. ylin@scau.edu.cn.
Xue WangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, Shandong, China. wangxue@sdu.edu.cn.
Wen-Ce WangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China. wangwence@scau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1753-7141
South China Agricultural University · CNShandong University · CNShantou University · CNInternational Livestock Research Institute · KEFirst Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CNLiaocheng University · CNPeking University · CNSansure Biotech (China) · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of Macau · MO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperuricemia (HUA) is a metabolic syndrome caused by abnormal purine metabolism. Although recent studies have noted a relationship between the gut microbiota and gout, whether the microbiota could ameliorate HUA-associated systemic purine metabolism remains unclear. In this study, we constructed a novel model of HUA in geese and investigated the mechanism by which Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) could have beneficial effects on HUA. The administration of antibiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) experiments were used in this HUA goose model. The effects of LGG and its metabolites on HUA were evaluated in vivo and in vitro. Heterogeneous expression and gene knockout of LGG revealed the mechanism of LGG. Multi-omics analysis revealed that the Lactobacillus genus is associated with changes in purine metabolism in HUA. This study showed that LGG and its metabolites could alleviate HUA through the gut-liver-kidney axis. Whole-genome analysis, heterogeneous expression, and gene knockout of LGG enzymes ABC-type multidrug transport system (ABCT), inosine-uridine nucleoside N-ribohydrolase (iunH), and xanthine permease (pbuX) demonstrated the function of nucleoside degradation in LGG. Multi-omics and a correlation analysis in HUA patients and this goose model revealed that a serum proline deficiency, as well as changes in Collinsella and Lactobacillus, may be associated with the occurrence of HUA. Our findings demonstrated the potential of a goose model of diet-induced HUA, and LGG and proline could be promising therapies for HUA.

Indexed as

HyperuricemiaLacticaseibacillus rhamnosusHumansLactobacillusNucleosidesProlinePurinesNucleosidesProlinePurines

Identifiers

PMID38509085
PMCPMC10954633
OpenAlexW4393002759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.