Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38508755›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2025

Potential smoke-free dividend across local areas in England: a cross-sectional analysis.

Damon Morris, Duncan Gillespie, Martin J Dockrell, Mark Cook, Marie Horton, Jamie Brown, Tessa Elisabeth Langley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Damon MorrisSheffield Addictions Research Group, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Duncan GillespieSheffield Addictions Research Group, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK duncan.gillespie@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3450-5747
Martin J DockrellSPECTRUM Consortium, UK.
Mark CookOffice for Health Improvement and Disparities, London, UK.
Marie HortonSPECTRUM Consortium, UK.
Jamie BrownSPECTRUM Consortium, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2797-5428
Tessa Elisabeth LangleySPECTRUM Consortium, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9560-1148

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S037519/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe value that might be added to local economies each year through the money that people who smoke tobacco would save if everyone quit smoking is called the 'smoke-free dividend'. This study aimed to estimate the value of the smoke-free dividend across local areas in England, and how it relates to the average income in those areas.

methodsThe study was a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of tobacco expenditure from the Smoking Toolkit Study (STS) matched to income and smoking prevalence data for English local authorities. The STS sample was from 2014 to 2020 and comprised 18 721 adults who smoke cigarettes. Self-reported expenditure estimates from the STS were adjusted for under-reporting. This adjustment aimed to align the total expenditure estimate with figures derived from government tax receipts and national estimates of illicit tobacco use. The smoke-free dividend is calculated as 93% of spending on legal tobacco, which is the percentage estimated to leave the local economy, plus 100% of spending on illicit tobacco.

resultsThe total dividend in England is estimated to be £10.9 billion each year, which equates to £1776 per person who smokes or £246 per adult regardless of smoking status. The estimated dividend is greater in areas with lower average income, with a correlation coefficient of -0.521 (95% CI -0.629, -0.392) between the average income of local areas and the dividend per adult.

conclusionsThis study has estimated that local economies could gain a substantial dividend if everybody stopped smoking, which is larger in lower income areas, meaning that geographical economic inequalities could be reduced.

Indexed as

Smoke-Free PolicySmokingSmoking CessationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceTobacco ProductsYoung AdultCessationDisparitiesEconomicsEnd gameIllegal tobacco products

Identifiers

PMID38508755
PMCPMC12322449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.