Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38508652›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Talking in primary care (TIP): protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial in UK primary care to assess clinical and cost-effectiveness of communication skills e-learning for practitioners on patients' musculoskeletal pain and enablement.

Felicity L Bishop, Nadia Cross, Rachel Dewar-Haggart, Emma Teasdale, Amy Herbert, Michelle E Robinson, Matthew J Ridd, Christian Mallen, Lorna Clarson, Jennifer Bostock and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Felicity L BishopSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK F.L.Bishop@southampton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8737-6662
Nadia CrossPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Science, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4148-7180
Rachel Dewar-HaggartSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3757-1152
Emma TeasdaleSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9147-193X
Amy HerbertCentre of Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0009-0008-6109-6006
Michelle E RobinsonKeele School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2266-8250
Matthew J RiddPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7954-8823
Christian MallenKeele School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2677-1028
Lorna ClarsonKeele School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0828-9649
Jennifer BostockPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Science, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9261-9350
Taeko BecquePrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Science, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0362-3794
Beth StuartWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5432-7437
Kirsty GarfieldHealth Economics Bristol, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8301-3602
Leanne MorrisonSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9961-551X
Sebastien PolletSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9924-9225
Jane VennikPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Science, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4602-9805
Helen AthertonPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Science, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7072-1925
Jeremy HowickLeicester Medical School, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0280-7206
Geraldine M LeydonPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Science, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5986-3300
Jacqui NuttallSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5826-2594
Nazrul IslamPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Science, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3982-4325
Paul H LeeSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5729-6450
Paul LittlePrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Science, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3664-1873
Hazel A EverittPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Science, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7362-8403
University of Southampton · GBKeele University · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEffective communication can help optimise healthcare interactions and patient outcomes. However, few interventions have been tested clinically, subjected to cost-effectiveness analysis or are sufficiently brief and well-described for implementation in primary care. This paper presents the protocol for determining the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a rigorously developed brief eLearning tool, EMPathicO, among patients with and without musculoskeletal pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A cluster randomised controlled trial in general practitioner (GP) surgeries in England and Wales serving patients from diverse geographic, socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds. GP surgeries are randomised (1:1) to receive EMPathicO e-learning immediately, or at trial end. Eligible practitioners (eg, GPs, physiotherapists and nurse practitioners) are involved in managing primary care patients with musculoskeletal pain. Patient recruitment is managed by practice staff and researchers. Target recruitment is 840 adults with and 840 without musculoskeletal pain consulting face-to-face, by telephone or video. Patients complete web-based questionnaires at preconsultation baseline, 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 months later. There are two patient-reported primary outcomes: pain intensity and patient enablement. Cost-effectiveness is considered from the National Health Service and societal perspectives. Secondary and process measures include practitioner patterns of use of EMPathicO, practitioner-reported self-efficacy and intentions, patient-reported symptom severity, quality of life, satisfaction, perceptions of practitioner empathy and optimism, treatment expectancies, anxiety, depression and continuity of care. Purposive subsamples of patients, practitioners and practice staff take part in up to two qualitative, semistructured interviews. ETHICS APPROVAL AND DISSEMINATION: Approved by the South Central Hampshire B Research Ethics Committee on 1 July 2022 and the Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales on 6 July 2022 (REC reference 22/SC/0145; IRAS project ID 312208). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed academic publications, conference presentations and patient and practitioner outlets. If successful, EMPathicO could quickly be made available at a low cost to primary care practices across the country. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN18010240.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionMusculoskeletal PainAdultCommunicationCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisEnglandHumansPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicState MedicineeHealthMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAININGMusculoskeletal disordersPatient-Centered CarePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID38508652
PMCPMC10953007
OpenAlexW4393020901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.