Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38508651›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Self-help friendliness and cooperation with self-help groups among rehabilitation clinics in Germany (KoReS): a mixed-methods study protocol.

Elâ Ziegler, Thea Bartzsch, Alf Trojan, Nicole Usko, Ines Krahn, Sabine Bütow, Christopher Kofahl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Self-Help-Friendly Hospitals: Integrating Self-Help Groups as a Complementary Service in Healthcare.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elâ ZieglerInstitute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany e.ziegler@uke.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2847-8087
Thea BartzschInstitute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Alf TrojanInstitute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Nicole UskoInstitute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ines KrahnNetwork for Self-Help Friendliness and Patient Orientation in Health Care, Berlin, Germany.
Sabine BütowGerman Working Group Self-Help Groups e.V, Gießen, Germany.
Christopher KofahlInstitute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0503-3077
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSelf-help is an important complement to medical rehabilitation for people with chronic diseases and disabilities. It contributes to stabilising rehabilitation success and further coping with disease and disability. Rehabilitation facilities are central in informing and referring patients to self-help groups. However, sustainable cooperation between rehabilitation and self-help, as can be achieved using the concept of self-help friendliness in healthcare, is rare, as is data on the cooperation situation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The KoReS study will examine self-help friendliness and cooperation between rehabilitation clinics and self-help associations in Germany, applying a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design. In the first qualitative phase, problem-centred interviews and focus groups are conducted with representatives of self-help-friendly rehabilitation clinics, members of their cooperating self-help groups and staff of self-help clearinghouses involved based on a purposeful sampling. Qualitative data collected will be analysed through content analysis using MAXQDA. The findings will serve to develop a questionnaire for a quantitative second phase. Cross-sectional online studies will survey staff responsible for self-help in rehabilitation clinics nationwide, representatives of self-help groups and staff of self-help clearinghouses. Quantitative data analysis with SPSS will include descriptive statistics, correlation, subgroup and multiple regression analyses. Additionally, a content analysis of rehabilitation clinics' websites will evaluate the visibility of self-help in their public relations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Local Psychological Ethics Committee at the Center for Psychosocial Medicine granted ethical approval (reference number LPEK-0648; 10.07.2023). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Results dissemination will comprise various formats such as workshops, presentations, homepages and publications for the international scientific community, rehabilitation centres, self-help organisations and the general public in Germany. For relevant stakeholders, practical guides and recommendations to implement self-help friendliness will derive from the results to strengthen patient orientation and cooperation between rehabilitation and self-help to promote the sustainability of rehabilitation processes.

Indexed as

Research DesignSelf-Help GroupsChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFocus GroupsGermanyHumansHealth ServicesObservational StudyPatient-Centered CarePatient ParticipationREHABILITATION MEDICINESocial Support

Identifiers

PMID38508651
PMCPMC10961549
OpenAlexW4393026058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.