Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38508636›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Preconception care: what do reproductive-aged women know and think in a community? A community-based, cross-sectional study at Mizan Aman town, Ethiopia.

Nuredin Mohammed Guta, Aklilu Mamo Dachew

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nuredin Mohammed GutaNursing, Mizan-Tepi University, Mizan, Ethiopia nurmogut@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7448-6002
Aklilu Mamo DachewNursing, Mizan-Tepi University, Mizan, Ethiopia.
Mizan Tepi University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess factors associated with knowledge and attitudes towards preconception care among reproductive-aged women in Mizan Aman town, southwest, Ethiopia. DESIGN AND

methodsA community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 November to 25 November 2021. The data were entered into Epidata V.3.1 and exported to SPSS V.26. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with outcome variables. SETTING AND

participantsThe study was conducted in Mizan Aman town, Southwest, Ethiopia. A total of 422 reproductive-aged women were enrolled in the study. OUTCOME: Knowledge and attitude towards preconception care, associated factors of preconception care.

results168 (39.8%) study subjects had good knowledge about preconception care, and 52.4% of the study subjects had a favourable attitude. Knowledge of preconception care was significantly associated with educational status (adjusted OR, AOR=6, p=0.01), marital status (AOR=1.47, p=0.001) and a positive attitude (AOR=1.8, p=0.08). Preconception care attitude was strongly associated with the maternal age group of 25-35 years (AOR=5.4, p=0.001), maternal age group of 36-42 years (AOR=3.5, p=0.02), source of income (AOR=5.3, p=0.01) and occupation (AOR=13.9, p=001).

conclusionThe study revealed that knowledge about preconception care was significantly lower. Disseminating preconception education and incorporating preconception care into the maternal continuum of care was the most important to boost the knowledge and attitude level of women towards preconception care.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePreconception CareAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansPregnancyReproductionMaternal medicinePrenatal diagnosisPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID38508636
PMCPMC10961510
OpenAlexW4393025945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.