ArticleBMJ open2024
Experiences of the clinical academic pathway: a qualitative study in Greater Manchester to improve the opportunities of minoritised clinical academics.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to explore the barriers and facilitators faced by clinical academics (CAs) in the Greater Manchester region, with particular attention to the experiences of minoritised groups.
designA qualitative study using semistructured interviews and focus groups was conducted. A reflexive thematic analysis was applied to identify key themes.
settingUniversity of Manchester and National Health Service Trusts in the Greater Manchester region.
participantsThe sample of this study was composed of 43 participants, including CAs, senior stakeholders, clinicians and medical and dental students.
resultsSix themes were identified. CAs face several barriers and facilitators, some of which-(1) funding insecurity and (2) high workload between the clinic and academia-are common to all the CAs. Other barriers, including (3) discrimination that translates into struggles with self-worth and feeling of not belonging, (4) being or being perceived as foreign and (5) unequal distribution of care duties, particularly affect people from minoritised groups. In contrast, (6) mentorship was commonly identified as one of the most important facilitators.
conclusionsCultural and structural interventions are needed, such as introducing financial support for early career CAs and intercalating healthcare students to promote wider social and cultural change and increase the feelings of belonging and representation across the entire CA pipeline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.