Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38508592›Full record

ArticleRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2025

Fluoroscopy-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of the lumbar medial branch nerves: dose escalation study and comparison with radiofrequency ablation in a porcine model.

Michael Gofeld, Thomas Tiennot, Eric Miller, Niv Rebhun, Stephen Mobley, Suzanne Leblang, Ron Aginsky, Arik Hananel, Jean-Francois Aubry

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07647757 (Safety and Efficacy of Using the Neurolyser XR Device for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Related Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07647757 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Efficacy of Using the Neurolyser XR Device for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Related Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederico II UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsSacroiliitis, Low Back PainArmsPatients treated with high intensity focused ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael GofeldUnika Medical Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada mikegofeld@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7372-4171
Thomas TiennotINSERM Physics for Medicine Paris, Paris, France.
Eric MillerFUS Mobile, Alpharetta, Georgia, USA.
Niv RebhunFUS Mobile, Alpharetta, Georgia, USA.
Stephen MobleyFUS Mobile, Alpharetta, Georgia, USA.
Suzanne LeblangFocused Ultrasound Foundation, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Ron AginskyFUSMobile LTD, Haifa, Israel.
Arik HananelFUS Mobile, Alpharetta, Georgia, USA.
Jean-Francois AubryPhysics for Medicine Paris, INSERM, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a common method for alleviating chronic back pain by targeting and ablating of facet joint sensory nerves. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an emerging, non-invasive, image-guided technology capable of providing thermal tissue ablation. While HIFU shows promise as a potentially superior option for ablating sensory nerves, its efficacy needs validation and comparison with existing methods.

methodsNine adult pigs underwent fluoroscopy-guided HIFU ablation of eight lumbar medial branch nerves, with varying acoustic energy levels: 1000 (N=3), 1500 (N=3), or 2000 (N=3) joules (J). An additional three animals underwent standard RFA (two 90 s long lesions at 80°C) of the same eight nerves. Following 2 days of neurobehavioral observation, all 12 animals were sacrificed. The targeted tissue was excised and subjected to macropathology and micropathology, with a primary focus on the medial branch nerves.

resultsThe percentage of ablated nerves with HIFU was 71%, 86%, and 96% for 1000 J, 1500 J, and 2000 J, respectively. In contrast, RFA achieved a 50% ablation rate. No significant adverse events occurred during the procedure or follow-up period.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that HIFU may be more effective than RFA in inducing thermal necrosis of the nerve.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationLumbar VertebraeRadiofrequency AblationSpinal NervesAnimalsFluoroscopyModels, AnimalSwineAnimal ExperimentationBack PainMethodsPain ManagementTECHNOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID38508592
PMCPMC12128762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.