Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38508589›Full record

Observational studyRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2025

Prospective evaluation of the safety of ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch blocks using the in-plane technique.

John-Paul B Etheridge, Roderick J Finlayson, Jan Venter, Frederik De Villiers, Jonathan P Etheridge, Reece Wakefield, Arraya Watanitanon

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04852393 (A Prospective Evaluation of the Safety and Clinical Effects of Ultrasound-guided Cervical Medial Branch Blocks), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04852393 completednot on this map

A Prospective Evaluation of the Safety and Clinical Effects of Ultrasound-guided Cervical Medial Branch Blocks

TypeobservationalSponsorMontreal General HospitalRan2021 to 2023Enrolled500ConditionsNeck Pain, Cervical SpondylosisArmsBlock
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John-Paul B EtheridgeBill Nelems Pain and Research Centre, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Roderick J FinlaysonBill Nelems Pain and Research Centre, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada roderick.finlayson@mac.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3845-6367
Jan VenterBill Nelems Pain and Research Centre, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Frederik De VilliersBill Nelems Pain and Research Centre, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Jonathan P EtheridgeBill Nelems Pain and Research Centre, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Reece WakefieldBill Nelems Pain and Research Centre, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Arraya WatanitanonBill Nelems Pain and Research Centre, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile fluoroscopic guidance is currently the imaging standard for cervical medial branch blocks (CMBBs), ultrasound guidance (USG) offers several potential safety advantages such as real-time needle visualization and the ability to detect and avoid critical soft tissue vascular or neural structures. However, no large-scale trials have examined the safety of USG for CMBB.

methodsFive hundred patients undergoing 2308 individual block levels were recruited using a prospective cohort design, and blocks were performed in an outpatient office setting using an in-plane USG technique. Primary outcomes included immediate block-related complication, as well as delayed occurrences, in the following 2 weeks. Vascular structures adjacent to the target area, as well as the occurrence of vascular breach, were recorded.

resultsThree minor immediate complications were noted (two subcutaneous hematomas, one vasovagal reaction) comprising 0.13% of blocks (0.03% to 0.38%; 95% two-sided CI), and no delayed events were recorded (0% to 0.16%; 97.5% one-sided CI). Blood vessels were detected and avoided in 8.2% of blocks, and vascular breach was noted in 0.52% of blocks (0.27% to 0.91%; 95% two-sided CI).

conclusionWhen performed using an in-plane technique by experienced operators, USG CMBB was found to be safe, with rare minor immediate complications and no further adverse event reported in the following 2 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04852393.

Indexed as

Cervical Plexus BlockCervical VertebraeUltrasonography, InterventionalAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesCHRONIC PAINCOMPLICATIONSNeck PainNerve BlockUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID38508589
PMCPMC12015066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.