Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38508374›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2024

Peering into the future: Eye movements predict neural repetition effects during episodic simulation.

Roni Setton, Jordana S Wynn, Daniel L Schacter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roni SettonHarvard University, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, MA, USA. Electronic address: rsetton@fas.harvard.edu.
Jordana S WynnUniversity of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Daniel L SchacterHarvard University, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

AGING MEMORYR37AG008441 · NIA · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI SCHACTER, DANIEL L · 2000 to 2009
$3.3M
Episodic Retrieval and Problem Solving in AgingR01AG008441 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI SCHACTER, DANIEL L · 1989 to 2022
$3.1M
TERMINATE CA2+ RELEASE BY LOCAL INACTIVATION OF RYANODINE RECEPTORS(RYR)IN HEARTZ01AG000841 · NIA · AGING · PI CHENG, HEPING · 1996 to 2004
–
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AG000841NIA NIH HHS R01 AG008441NIA NIH HHS R37 AG008441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imagining future scenarios involves recombining different elements of past experiences into a coherent event, a process broadly supported by the brain's default network. Prior work suggests that distinct brain regions may contribute to the inclusion of different simulation features. Here we examine how activity in these brain regions relates to the vividness of future simulations. Thirty-four healthy young adults imagined future events with familiar people and locations in a two-part study involving a repetition suppression paradigm. First, participants imagined events while their eyes were tracked during a behavioral session. Immediately after, participants imagined events during MRI scanning. The events to be imagined were manipulated such that some were identical to those imagined in the behavioral session while others involved new locations, new people, or both. In this way, we could examine how self-report ratings and eye movements predict brain activity during simulation along with specific simulation features. Vividness ratings were negatively correlated with eye movements, in contrast to an often-observed positive relationship with past recollection. Moreover, fewer eye movements predicted greater involvement of the hippocampus during simulation, an effect specific to location features. Our findings suggest that eye movements may facilitate scene construction for future thinking, lending support to frameworks that spatial information forms the foundation of episodic simulation.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsMemory, EpisodicBrainBrain MappingHippocampusHumansImaginationMental RecallYoung AdultDefault networkEpisodic simulationEye movementsHippocampusVividness

Identifiers

PMID38508374
PMCPMC11140475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.