Trial reportDiving and hyperbaric medicine2024
Equipoise: an important ethical consideration when contemplating participation in a randomised controlled trial of hyperbaric oxygen treatment in necrotising soft tissue infections.
Trial report in Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of Hyperbaric Oxygen in Patients with Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: A Scandinavian Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Cohort.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2025Article
- Core outcome set for research in necrotising soft tissue infection patients: an international, multidisciplinary, modified Delphi consensus study.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A proposal for a large, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial investigating the role of hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) in necrotising soft tissue infections (NSTI) has led to much discussion locally and internationally about whether participation is ethical for a centre where stakeholders already consider HBOT standard practice. This article systematically addresses the concept of clinical equipoise specific to the role of HBOT in NSTI, and presents a series of considerations to be taken into account by key stakeholders at potential participating sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.