Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38507683›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2024

Microclots, as defined by amyloid-fibrinogen aggregates, predict risks of disseminated intravascular coagulation and mortality.

Jeremy Schofield, Simon T Abrams, Rosalind Jenkins, Steven Lane, Guozheng Wang, Cheng-Hock Toh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Fibrinaloid microclots in long COVID: assessing the actual evidence properly.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeremy SchofieldDepartment of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2761-913X
Simon T AbramsDepartment of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3949-2455
Rosalind JenkinsCentre for Drug Safety Science Bioanalytical Facility, Liverpool Shared Research Facilities, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3730-1136
Steven LaneDepartment of Medical Statistics, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Guozheng WangDepartment of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Cheng-Hock TohDepartment of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-8883

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractMicroclots have been associated with various conditions, including postacute sequelae of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. They have been postulated to be amyloid-fibrin(ogen) aggregates, but their role as a prognostic biomarker remains unclear. To examine their possible clinical utility, blood samples were collected for the first 96 hours from critically ill patients (n = 104) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Detection was by staining platelet-poor plasma samples with thioflavin T and visualized by fluorescent microscopy. Image J software was trained to identify and quantify microclots, which were detected in 44 patients (42.3%) on ICU admission but not in the remaining 60 (57.7%) or the 20 healthy controls (0.0%). Microclots on admission to ICU were associated with a primary diagnosis of sepsis (microclots present in sepsis, 23/44 [52.3%] vs microclots absent in sepsis, 19/60 [31.7%]; P = .044). Multicolor immunofluorescence demonstrated that microclots consisted of amyloid-fibrinogen aggregates, which was supported by proteomic analysis. Patients with either a high number or larger-sized microclots had a higher likelihood of developing disseminated intravascular coagulation (odds ratio [OR], 51.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3-6721.1; P < .001) and had an increased probability of 28-day mortality (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 2.0-15.6; P < .001). This study concludes that microclots, as defined by amyloid-fibrin(ogen) aggregates, are potentially useful in identifying sepsis and predicting adverse coagulopathic and clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

AmyloidCOVID-19Disseminated Intravascular CoagulationFibrinogenAgedBiomarkersCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProtein AggregatesSARS-CoV-2SepsisAmyloidBiomarkersFibrinogenProtein Aggregates

Identifiers

PMID38507683
PMCPMC11131067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.