Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38507617›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2024

The Impact of Monetary Incentives on Delay Discounting Within a Year-Long Physical Activity Intervention.

Vincent Berardi, Christine B Phillips, Mindy L McEntee, Chad Stecher, Michael Todd, Marc A Adams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vincent BerardiDepartment of Psychology, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9760-6241
Christine B PhillipsDepartment of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3467-8413
Mindy L McEnteeCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1671-4940
Chad StecherCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2218-3306
Michael ToddEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1981-4245
Marc A AdamsCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6310-1472

Funding

WalkIT: Neighborhood walkability and moderation of adaptive walking interventionsR01CA198915 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI ADAMS, MARC A · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS R01 CA198915NIH HHS R01CA198915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelay discounting is the depreciation in a reward's perceived value as a function of the time until receipt. Monetary incentive programs that provide rewards contingent on meeting daily physical activity (PA) goals may change participants' delay discounting preferences. PURPOSE: Determine if monetary incentives provided in close temporal proximity to meeting PA goals changed delay discounting, and if such changes mediated intervention effects.

methodsInactive adults (n = 512) wore accelerometers during a 12-month intervention where they received proximal monetary incentives for meeting daily moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) goals or delayed incentives for study participation. Delay discount rate and average MVPA were assessed at baseline, end of intervention, and a 24-month follow-up. Using structural equation modeling, we tested effects of proximal versus delayed rewards on delay discounting and whether any changes mediated intervention effects on MVPA. PA self-efficacy was also evaluated as a potential mediator, and both self-efficacy and delay discounting were assessed as potential moderators of intervention effects.

resultsProximal rewards significantly increased participants' delay discounting (β = 0.238, confidence interval [CI]: -0.078, 0.380), indicating greater sensitivity to reinforcement timing. This change did not mediate incentive-associated increases in MVPA at the end of the 12-month intervention (β = -0.016, CI: -0.053, 0.019) or at a 24-month follow-up (β = -0.020, CI: -0.059, 0.018). Moderation effects were not found.

conclusionsIncentive-induced increases in delay discounting did not deleteriously impact MVPA. This finding may help assuage concerns about using monetary incentives for PA promotion, but further research regarding the consequences of changes in delay discounting is warranted.

Indexed as

Delay DiscountingMotivationAdultExerciseHumansRewardContingency managementDelay discountingMediationPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID38507617
PMCPMC11008587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.