ArticlePLoS genetics2024
A quantitative genetic model of background selection in humans.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic insights into natural selection in recent human history.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Pervasive cryptic selection in the human noncoding genome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Causal inference clarifies the roles of background selection and mutation rate variation in shaping human genetic diversity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Background selection in recombining genomes and its consequences for the maintenance of variation in complex traits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A model for background selection in non-equilibrium populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A model of Hill-Robertson interference caused by purifying selection in a nonrecombining genome.Genetics · 2025Article
- Inferring demographic and selective histories from population genomic data using a 2-step approach in species with coding-sparse genomes: an application to human data.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Unraveling genomic regions with transmission ratio distortion harboring putative lethal alleles and their biological implications in Nellore cattle from experimental selection lines.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- FST and genetic diversity in an island model with background selection.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Inferring demographic and selective histories from population genomic data using a two-step approach in species with coding-sparse genomes: an application to human data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Fast and Accurate Estimation of Selection Coefficients and Allele Histories from Ancient and Modern DNA.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- A quantitative genetic model of background selection in humans.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Accurate inference of population history in the presence of background selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Across the human genome, there are large-scale fluctuations in genetic diversity caused by the indirect effects of selection. This "linked selection signal" reflects the impact of selection according to the physical placement of functional regions and recombination rates along chromosomes. Previous work has shown that purifying selection acting against the steady influx of new deleterious mutations at functional portions of the genome shapes patterns of genomic variation. To date, statistical efforts to estimate purifying selection parameters from linked selection models have relied on classic Background Selection theory, which is only applicable when new mutations are so deleterious that they cannot fix in the population. Here, we develop a statistical method based on a quantitative genetics view of linked selection, that models how polygenic additive fitness variance distributed along the genome increases the rate of stochastic allele frequency change. By jointly predicting the equilibrium fitness variance and substitution rate due to both strong and weakly deleterious mutations, we estimate the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) and mutation rate across three geographically distinct human samples. While our model can accommodate weaker selection, we find evidence of strong selection operating similarly across all human samples. Although our quantitative genetic model of linked selection fits better than previous models, substitution rates of the most constrained sites disagree with observed divergence levels. We find that a model incorporating selective interference better predicts observed divergence in conserved regions, but overall our results suggest uncertainty remains about the processes generating fitness variation in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.