Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38507404›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Climate change, biodiversity loss, and Indigenous Peoples' health and wellbeing: A systematic umbrella review.

Laura Jane Brubacher, Laura Peach, Tara Tai-Wen Chen, Sheri Longboat, Warren Dodd, Susan J Elliott, Kaitlyn Patterson, Hannah Neufeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Climate change and mental health: Position paper of the European Psychiatric Association.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura Jane BrubacherSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2806-9539
Laura PeachSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Tara Tai-Wen ChenDepartment of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0731-0357
Sheri LongboatSchool of Environmental Design and Rural Development, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Warren DoddSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0774-7644
Susan J ElliottDepartment of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Kaitlyn PattersonSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Hannah NeufeldSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indigenous Peoples worldwide are experiencing a cascade of impacts on their health and wellbeing as a result of climate change and biodiversity loss. Existing literature at the interface of climate change, biodiversity loss, and Indigenous health tells us that Indigenous Peoples are among those most disproportionately and acutely affected by these impacts. Yet, a gap exists with respect to comprehensively and critically synthesizing the impacts reported across this literature and identifying Indigenous-led responses. Guided by an Indigenous advisory group, we employed a systematic umbrella review methodology, following PRISMA guidelines, to characterize the global secondary literature (PROSPERO registration #: CRD42023417060). In so doing, we identified the proximal, intermediate, distal, and gendered impacts of climate change and biodiversity loss on Indigenous health and wellbeing as well as Indigenous-led responses. Five databases were searched for published reviews, along with a grey literature search that focused on underrepresented geographic regions in the academic literature. Two independent reviewers conducted two-stage screening, data extraction, and quality assessment of retrieved records. Basic descriptive statistics were calculated. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically, using a constant comparative approach. A total of 38 review articles met the eligibility criteria and 37 grey literature records were retrieved and included in the review. Reviews were published between 2010-2023 and geographically clustered in the Circumpolar North. Intersecting proximal, intermediate, and distal impacts were characterized as place-based and specific, and linked to colonialism as an antecedent to and driver of these impacts. Gendered impacts were underexplored within reviews. Reviewed literature underscored the value of engaging diverse knowledge systems; platforming localized, community-led adaptation to climate change and biodiversity loss, while addressing sociopolitical constraints to these efforts; and applying a broader conceptualization of health that aligns with Indigenous frameworks. Going forward, we must foreground equity- and rights-based considerations within integrated responses to climate and biodiversity crises.

Identifiers

PMID38507404
PMCPMC10954122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.