Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38507183›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2024

Screening for central precocious puberty by single basal Luteinizing Hormone levels.

Alessandra Li Pomi, Perla Scalini, Salvatore De Masi, Domenico Corica, Giorgia Pepe, Malgorzata Wasniewska, Stefano Stagi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MECP2 Rare Variants in Boys With Central Precocious Puberty.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Construction of a diagnostic model and scoring system for central precocious puberty in girls, with external validation].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alessandra Li PomiDepartment of Human Pathology of Adulthood and Childhood, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-4905-371X
Perla ScaliniMeyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy.
Salvatore De MasiClinical Trial Center, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5889-9280
Domenico CoricaDepartment of Human Pathology of Adulthood and Childhood, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3628-1612
Giorgia PepeDepartment of Human Pathology of Adulthood and Childhood, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1130-829X
Malgorzata WasniewskaDepartment of Human Pathology of Adulthood and Childhood, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8299-2677
Stefano StagiMeyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy. stefano.stagi@unifi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-2259-4685

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify cut-off for basal LH levels and for pelvic ultrasound uterine and ovarian parameters indicating an Hypotalamic-Pituitary-Gonadal (HPG) axis activation as diagnostic of Central Precocious Puberty (CPP).

methods248 girls referred for suspected precocious/early puberty who had undergone a GnRH stimulation test were enrolled and divided into three groups: Premature Idiopathic Thelarche (PIT), CPP, and Early Puberty (EA). For every patient basal serum Luteinising Hormone (LH) and Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH), basal LH/FSH ratio and pelvic ultrasonographic parameters were also collected. Through the use of Receiver Operating Curves (ROCs) the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of basal LH, FSH, LH/FSH ratio and ultrasonographic parameters were evaluated at each level and Area Under the Curve (AUC) was measured.

resultsBasal LH model ≥0.14 mIU/mL reached the highest predictability (90.6% and 78.2%, Se and Sp, respectively). Basal LH/FSH ratio ≥0.1 showed a sensitivity of 85.90% and a specificity of 78.14%, while basal FSH cut-off (≥2.36 mIU/mL) had the lowest predictability, with a less favourable sensitivity (71%) and specificity (70.5%). Cut-off point for uterine length as 35 mm, (83.5% and 42.9% of Se and Sp, respectively) was calculated. For ovarian volumes, ROC curves showed very low sensitivity and specificity.

conclusionA single basal LH measurement under the cut-off limit may be adequate to exclude an HPG axis activation as CPP.

Indexed as

Follicle Stimulating HormoneLuteinizing HormonePuberty, PrecociousChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMass ScreeningOvaryROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyUterusFollicle Stimulating HormoneLuteinizing HormoneDiagnosisGnRH testLHLuteinizing hormonePrecocious pubertyPuberty

Identifiers

PMID38507183
PMCPMC11291536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.