Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38507131›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2024

Exploring the accuracy of musical tempo memory: The effects of reproduction method, reference tempo, and musical expertise.

Julia Vigl, Friederike Koehler, Heike Henning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia ViglDepartment of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Universitätsstraße 15, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. julia.vigl@uibk.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-2152-7584
Friederike KoehlerCentre of Excellence in Music, Mind, Body and Brain, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0877-7100
Heike HenningDepartment of Music Pedagogy, University Mozarteum Salzburg, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

Research Competition Mozarteum award from December 2020Research Council of Finland 346210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although people commonly remember and recreate the tempo of musical pieces with high accuracy, comparatively less is known regarding sources of potential variation in musical tempo memory. This study therefore aimed to investigate musical tempo memory accuracy and the effects of reference tempo, reproduction method, musical expertise, and their interaction. A sample of 403 individuals with varying levels of musical training participated in the experimental online study, including nonmusicians, amateur musicians, and professional musicians. Participants were tasked with reproducing the tempos of 19 popular pop/rock songs using two methods: tempo tapping and adjusting the tempo of the audio file based on the previously tapped tempo. Results from multilevel models revealed overall high accuracy in tempo memory, with tempo adjusting yielding greater accuracy compared with tempo tapping. Higher musical expertise was associated with increased accuracy in tempo production. In addition, we observed a quadratic effect of reference tempo, with the greatest accuracy in tempo reproduction around 120 bpm. Gender, age, familiarity with the pieces, and accompaniment strategies were also associated with greater accuracy. These findings provide insights into the factors influencing musical tempo memory and have implications for understanding the cognitive processes involved in tempo perception and reproduction.

Indexed as

MusicTime PerceptionAdolescentAdultAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleMemoryMiddle AgedPsychomotor PerformanceYoung AdultMusical expertiseMusical tempo memoryTappingTempo perceptionTempo reproduction

Identifiers

PMID38507131
PMCPMC11362532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.