Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38507101›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the follow-up of non-muscle-invasive bladder tumors after intravesical instillations: a promising tool.

Clément Klein, Serge Brunelle, Mathias Illy, Valeria De Luca, Laure Doisy, François Lannes, Davidson Sypre, Nicolas Branger, Thomas Maubon, Stanislas Rybikowski and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Clément KleinUrology Department, CHU Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France. clement.klein@chu-bordeaux.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1839-5875
Serge BrunelleRadiology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009, Marseille, France.
Mathias IllyRadiology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009, Marseille, France.
Valeria De LucaRadiology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009, Marseille, France.
Laure DoisyDepartment of Surgical Oncology 2, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009, Marseille, France.
François LannesDepartment of Surgical Oncology 2, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009, Marseille, France.
Davidson SypreDepartment of Surgical Oncology 2, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009, Marseille, France.
Nicolas BrangerDepartment of Surgical Oncology 2, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009, Marseille, France.
Thomas MaubonDepartment of Surgical Oncology 2, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009, Marseille, France.
Stanislas RybikowskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology 2, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009, Marseille, France.
Mathilde GuérinMedical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009, Marseille, France.
Gwenaëlle GravisMedical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009, Marseille, France.
Jochen WalzDepartment of Surgical Oncology 2, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009, Marseille, France.
Geraldine PignotDepartment of Surgical Oncology 2, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009, Marseille, France.
Institut Paoli-Calmettes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe standard follow-up for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is based on cystoscopy. Unfortunately, post-instillation inflammatory changes can make the interpretation of this exam difficult, with lower specificity. This study aimed to evaluate the interest of bladder MRI in the follow-up of patients following intravesical instillation.

methodsData from patients who underwent cystoscopy and bladder MRI in a post-intravesical instillation setting between February 2020 and March 2023 were retrospectively collected. Primary endpoint was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of cystoscopy and bladder MRI in the overall cohort (n = 67) using the pathologic results of TURB as a reference. The secondary endpoint was to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of cystoscopy and bladder MRI according to the appearance of the lesion on cystoscopy [flat (n = 40) or papillary (n = 27)].

resultsThe diagnostic performance of bladder MRI was better than that of cystoscopy, with a specificity of 47% (vs. 6%, p < 0.001), a negative predictive value of 88% (vs. 40%, p = 0.03), and a positive predictive value of 66% (vs. 51%, p < 0.001), whereas the sensitivity did not significantly differ between the two exams. In patients with doubtful cystoscopy and negative MRI findings, inflammatory changes were found on TURB in most cases (17/19). The superiority in MRI bladder performance prevailed for "flat lesions", while no significant difference was found for "papillary lesions".

conclusionsIn cases of doubtful cystoscopy after intravesical instillations, MRI appears to be relevant with good performance in differentiating post-therapeutic inflammatory changes from recurrent tumor lesions and could potentially allow avoiding unnecessary TURB.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdministration, IntravesicalCystoscopyFollow-Up StudiesHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesBladder cancerIntravesical instillationMagnetic Imaging ResonanceNon-muscle-invasive bladder cancerUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID38507101
OpenAlexW4392986255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.