ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024
Immunophenotyping, Part II: Analysis of Nanoparticle Effects on the Composition and Activation Status of Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expanding Chemical Space of Nucleic Acid Nanoparticles for Tunable Antiviral-Like Immunomodulatory Responses and Potent Adjuvant Activity.Advanced functional materials · 2026Article
- Comparative analyses for plant virus-based cancer immunotherapy drug development.Cell biomaterials · 2025Article
- Role of physicochemical properties in silica nanoparticle-mediated immunostimulation.Nanotoxicology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of nanoparticles as drug delivery carriers requires analysis of their safety, which among other tests, includes immunotoxicity. Nanoparticles are also increasingly used for applications intended to specifically activate, inhibit, or modify the immune system's responses to improve the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders, cancer immunotherapy, and vaccines targeting cancer cells and viral and bacterial pathogens. In addition to the safety, the analysis of nanoparticles intended for immune system targeting includes mechanistic immunology investigations. Immunophenotyping provides researchers with a tool to assess the immune cell viability and activation status. These results provide mechanistic insights into nanoparticle efficacy and toxicity and therefore are of interest to the biomedical nanotechnology field. However, no standardized approaches exist due to the breadth of methods and instruments available for this analysis. This chapter provides detailed instructions for applying this methodology to analyze nanoparticle effects on subsets of immune cells present in peripheral blood. While this experimental strategy is specific to the NovoCyte 3005 flow cytometer, it can be adapted to other instruments. Instructions for instrument setup, calibration, and antibody qualification are described in this book's Chapter 24 , Immunophenotyping, part I.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.