ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024
Methods for Analysis of Nanoparticle Immunosuppressive Properties.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adverse drug effects on immune system function represent a significant concern in the pharmaceutical industry, because 10-20% of drug withdrawal from the market is attributed to immunotoxicity. Immunosuppression is one such adverse effect. The traditional immune function test used to estimate materials' immunosuppression is T cell dependent antibody response (TDAR). This method involves a 28-day in vivo study evaluating the animal's antibody titer to a known antigen (Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin; KLH) with and without challenge. Due to the limited quantities of novel drug candidates, an in vitro method called human lymphocyte activation (HuLA) assay has been developed to substitute the traditional TDAR assay during early preclinical development. In this test, leukocytes isolated from healthy donors vaccinated with the current year's flu vaccine are incubated with Fluzone in the presence or absence of nanoparticles. The antigen-specific lymphocyte proliferation is then measured by ELISA analyzing incorporation of BrdU into DNA of the proliferating cells. Here we describe the experimental procedures for investigating immunosuppressive properties of nanoparticles by both TDAR and HuLA assays, discuss the in vitro-in vivo correlation of these methods, and show a case study using the iron oxide nanoparticle formulation, Feraheme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38507007What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.