Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38506976›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2024

[Patient and public involvement at the German Center for Mental Health: achievements and challenges].

Silke Lipinski, Ulrike Sünkel, Christina Totzeck, Thomas Dresler, Irina Baskow, Myriam Bea, Rüdiger Hannig, Isabel Dziobek

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. [Patient participation in health research in Germany : Current status and future prospects].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Silke LipinskiTrialogischer Zentrumsrat des DZPG, German Center for Mental Health (DZPG).
Ulrike SünkelTrialogischer Zentrumsrat des DZPG, German Center for Mental Health (DZPG).
Christina TotzeckTrialogischer Zentrumsrat des DZPG, German Center for Mental Health (DZPG).
Thomas DreslerTrialogischer Zentrumsrat des DZPG, German Center for Mental Health (DZPG).
Irina BaskowTrialogischer Zentrumsrat des DZPG, German Center for Mental Health (DZPG).
Myriam BeaTrialogischer Zentrumsrat des DZPG, German Center for Mental Health (DZPG).
Rüdiger HannigTrialogischer Zentrumsrat des DZPG, German Center for Mental Health (DZPG).
Isabel DziobekTrialogischer Zentrumsrat des DZPG, German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), . isabel.dziobek@hu-berlin.de.
German Center for Lung Research · DEGesellschaft für Pädagogik und Information · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DERuhr University Bochum · DEUniversitätsklinikum Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient and public involvement (PPI) describes the participation of patients and relatives, i.e., experts by experience (EE), in the research process. The PPI has not been widely adopted in the fields of medicine and clinical psychology in Germany and there is a notable absence of institutional support. The German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), which has been under construction since May 2023, aims to achieve nationwide and cross-center implementation of PPI, constituting one of its primary objectives. Participation of EE is to be implemented in the DZPG at all levels of decision-making.

objectivesThe article describes the origins, development and challenges associated with the implementation of participation structures and projects in the DZPG. The central political PPI committee in the DZPG, the Trilogue Center Council (TZR), developed a comprehensive PPI strategy for the DZPG in almost 3 years of work, before the beginning of the financial support of the DZPG. Among various measures, the strategy entails establishing a far-reaching representation for EE in all decision-making bodies of the DZPG, to involve EE as reviewers in evaluating research proposals, to integrate participatory elements into all studies of the DZGG and to foster user-initiated research endeavors. The implementation of the strategy is ensured by a cross-center PPI infrastructure, the Center for PPI, and scientific PPI consultants. The Center for PPI's tasks include supporting the voice of the EE and developing instruments and guidelines for participatory research, bringing together EE and researchers for joint DZPG projects as well as the documentation and quality assurance for participatory research. One of the particular challenges for the successful implementation of the PPI strategy is the limited experience with PPI in Germany in the field of mental health research and the widespread lack of structural implementation. Currently developed solution strategies include training for researchers and EE to communicate the benefits and pathways in the realization of PPI and thus enable shared decision-making and research. In addition, extensive access to knowledge and resources for EE will be created and uniform remuneration regulations for EE will be developed.

conclusionA PPI strategy at the DZPG has been successfully developed and is currently being implemented by the cross-center infrastructure Center for PPI.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationCommunity ParticipationGermanyHumansMental DisordersMental Health ServicesParticipationParticipatory researchPatient participationRelatives participationTrilogue

Identifiers

PMID38506976
PMCPMC11068695
OpenAlexW4392990574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.