Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38506904›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

An Ecological Mobile Momentary Intervention to Support Dynamic Goal Pursuit: Feasibility and Acceptability Study.

Ciarán O'Driscoll, Aneesha Singh, Iya Chichua, Joachim Clodic, Anjali Desai, Dara Nikolova, Alex Jie Yap, Irene Zhou, Stephen Pilling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ciarán O'DriscollCORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7316-3041
Aneesha SinghUCL Interaction Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0835-5802
Iya ChichuaCORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6973-6286
Joachim ClodicCORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2112-1297
Anjali DesaiCORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3769-8881
Dara NikolovaCORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8185-3277
Alex Jie YapCORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2599-4123
Irene ZhouCORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4154-6224
Stephen PillingCORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7361-8202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals can experience difficulties pursuing their goals amid multiple competing priorities in their environment. Effective goal dynamics require flexible and generalizable pursuit skills. Supporting successful goal pursuit requires a perpetually adapting intervention responsive to internal states.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to (1) develop a flexible intervention that can adapt to an individual's changing short to medium-term goals and be applied to their daily life and (2) examine the feasibility and acceptability of the just-in-time adaptive intervention for goal pursuit.

methodsThis study involved 3 iterations to test and systematically enhance all aspects of the intervention. During the pilot phase, 73 participants engaged in an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) over 1 month. After week 1, they attended an intervention training session and received just-in-time intervention prompts during the following 3 weeks. The training employed the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behavior (COM-B) framework for goal setting, along with mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII). Subsequent prompts, triggered by variability in goal pursuit, guided the participants to engage in MCII in relation to their current goal. We evaluated feasibility and acceptability, efficacy, and individual change processes by combining intensive (single-case experimental design) and extensive methods.

resultsThe results suggest that the digital intervention was feasible and acceptable to participants. Compliance with the intervention was high (n=63, 86%). The participants endorsed high acceptability ratings relating to both the study procedures and the intervention. All participants (N=73, 100%) demonstrated significant improvements in goal pursuit with an average difference of 0.495 units in the outcome (P<.001). The results of the dynamic network modeling suggest that self-monitoring behavior (EMA) and implementing the MCII strategy may aid in goal reprioritization, where goal pursuit itself is a driver of further goal pursuit.

conclusionsThis pilot study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of a just-in-time adaptive intervention among a nonclinical adult sample. This intervention used self-monitoring of behavior, the COM-B framework, and MCII strategies to improve dynamic goal pursuit. It was delivered via an Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMI) procedure. Future research should consider the utility of this approach as an additional intervention element within psychological interventions to improve goal pursuit. Sustaining goal pursuit throughout interventions is central to their effectiveness and warrants further evaluation.

Indexed as

acceptabilityCOM-Bdynamicsecological momentary assessmentecological momentary interventioneffectivenessfeasibilitygoal pursuitimplementationMCIImoodnetwork analysispilot studypsychologicalself-monitoringsupporttraining

Identifiers

PMID38506904
PMCPMC10993123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.