Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38506801›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Development and Validation of an Internet-Based Remote Perimeter (Perimouse).

Zidong Chen, Xiaoyuan Shen, Yuning Zhang, Wenxin Yang, Jiexin Ye, Zhiqiang Ouyang, Guifeng Zheng, Yangfan Yang, Minbin Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zidong ChenSun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangzhou, PR China.
Xiaoyuan ShenSun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangzhou, PR China.
Yuning ZhangSun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangzhou, PR China.
Wenxin YangSun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangzhou, PR China.
Jiexin YeSun Yat-Sen University, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Guangzhou, PR China.
Zhiqiang OuyangSun Yat-Sen University, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Guangzhou, PR China.
Guifeng ZhengSun Yat-Sen University, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Guangzhou, PR China.
Yangfan YangSun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangzhou, PR China.
Minbin YuSun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangzhou, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We sought to validate the feasibility of Perimouse, an internet-based remote perimeter that allows for natural fixation and can be performed on most computers via a web page. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, Perimouse evaluated the visual field of 45 healthy people and 27 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma on a laptop. Participants used a mouse cursor to locate new dots on the screen that were determined by preset saccade vectors. A "click and confirm" strategy was used to eliminate the unwanted visual search. Dot brightness was either fixed at 12 dB in the suprathreshold program (screening program) or variable in the threshold program. We compared Perimouse outcomes with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 24-2 Swedish Interactive Testing Algorithm standard program. Results: In the screening program, Perimouse showed moderate to high concordance with HFA. The intraclass coefficient ranged from 0.58 to 0.86 in different areas of Garway-Heath mapping. In the threshold program, normal subjects had threshold ranging from 19 to 16 dB, presenting sensitivity changes according to the "hill of vision". The test-retest difference was 0.09 dB. Habitual spectacle correction and environmental luminance (2-337 lux) had little impact on the central or peripheral threshold (P > 0.05). The correlation between Perimouse and HFA threshold sensitivity was strong (R = 0.950), although Perimouse mean defect was 4.40 dB higher than the HFA mean defect. Conclusions: Perimouse is a reliable visual field test that correlates strongly with HFA. It shows potential for population screening and monitoring visual field defects. Translational Relevance: Perimouse assesses the visual field using saccade vectors without eye trackers, enhancing its accessibility via a web page.

Indexed as

Glaucoma, Open-AngleAlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInternetVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID38506801
PMCPMC10959190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.