ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Impact of Acute Ocular Hypertension on Retinal Ganglion Cell Loss in Mice.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of short-term moderate versus high intraocular pressure elevation on flicker-induced changes in full-field electroretinogram.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Mapping Multiscale Brain Changes in Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Using Regional Radiomics Similarity Networks.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Thy1-YFP: an effective tool for single cell tracing from neuronal progenitors to mature functionally active neurons.Cell death discovery · 2025Article
- Impact of elevated IOP on lamina cribrosa oxygenation; A combined experimental-computational study on monkeys.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Impact of Elevated Intraocular Pressure on Lamina Cribrosa Oxygenation: A Combined Experimental-Computational Study on Monkeys.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the correlation between intraocular pressure (IOP) levels and retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss across different fixed-duration episodes of acute ocular hypertension (AOH). Methods: AOH was induced in Thy1-YFP-H transgenic mice by inserting a needle connected to a saline solution container into the anterior chamber. Thirty-one groups were tested, each comprising three to five mice exposed to IOP levels ranging from 50 to 110 mm Hg in 5/10 mm Hg increments for 60/90/120 minutes and a sham control group. The YFP-expressing RGCs were quantified by confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, whereas peripapillary ganglion cell complex thickness was measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Changes in RGC count and GCCT were determined from values measured 30 days after AOH relative to baseline (before AOH). Results: In the 60-minute AOH groups, RGC loss varied even when IOP was increased up to 110 mm Hg (36.8%-68.2%). However, for longer durations (90 and 120 minutes), a narrow range of IOP levels (60-70 mm Hg for 90-minute duration; 55-65 mm Hg for 120-minute duration) produced a significant difference in RGC loss, ranging from <25% to >90%. Additionally, loss of YFP-expressing RGCs was comparable to that of total RGCs in the same retinas. Conclusions: Reproducible RGC loss during AOH depends on precise durations and IOP thresholds. In the current study, the optimal choice is an AOH protocol set at 70 mm Hg for a duration of 90 minutes. Translational Relevance: This study can assist in determining the optimal duration and intensity of IOP for the effective utilization of AOH models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.