Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38506130›Full record

ReviewSeminars in dialysis

The Revival of Sorbents in Chronic Dialysis Treatment.

Jeroen Peter Kooman

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in dialysis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeroen Peter KoomanDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in the use of sorbents in chronic dialysis treatment has undergone a revival in the last decades, for which two major factors are responsible. The first is the potential of sorbents as adjunct therapy for the removal of substances that are difficult to remove by conventional dialysis therapies. The second is their use in regeneration of dialysate, which is of pivotal importance in the design of portable or even wearable treatments, next to the potential for reducing water use during conventional dialysis treatment. Sorbent-enhanced dialysis with synthetic polymers was associated with a reduction in inflammatory parameters as compared to hemodialysis and even associated with improved survival in smaller studies, although this needs to be confirmed in large randomized trials. Incorporation of sorbents within a dialysis membrane (mixed matrix membrane) appears a promising way forward to reduce the complexity and costs of a dual therapy but needs to be tested in vivo. For regeneration of dialysate, at present, a combination of urease, zirconium-based sorbents, and activated charcoal is used. Next to sodium release by the sorbent in exchange for ammonium and the CO

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicRenal DialysisAdsorptionDialysis SolutionsHumansMembranes, ArtificialDialysis SolutionsMembranes, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID38506130
PMCPMC11867157
OpenAlexW4393006584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.